sid
17th of February 2005 (Thu), 11:49
I'm interested in Macro photography and currently have the Digital Rebel with just the kit lens. My interest right now is confined to static subjects. It appears that most people recommend the specialized macro lenses which seem to be on the expensive side (for obvious reasons). At this time, I dont have the budget to buy a dedicated macro lens and I was able to find a lot of good information here about the 250D/500D closeup lenses. So far I've read that:
(1) The Canon 250D/500D are optically superior to the 500
(2) The 250D is optimized for use with lenses from 50-135mm
(3) The 500D is optimized for use with lenses from 75-300mm
I've read posts recommending the 500D and using step up rings. (Also seen the excellent writeup on Roger Cavanagh's (http://www.rogercavanagh.com/helpinfo/18_500d-1.stm) website).
I dont plan on purchasing a lens that falls in the 75-300mm category any time soon.
So, my questions are:
(1) Is it worth it to get the 500D and steup up rings or just stick with the 250D ?
(2) More basic question: Which one (250D/500D) gives a better working distance ? (You can define "better" :D )
Appreciate the advice.
(1) The Canon 250D/500D are optically superior to the 500
(2) The 250D is optimized for use with lenses from 50-135mm
(3) The 500D is optimized for use with lenses from 75-300mm
I've read posts recommending the 500D and using step up rings. (Also seen the excellent writeup on Roger Cavanagh's (http://www.rogercavanagh.com/helpinfo/18_500d-1.stm) website).
I dont plan on purchasing a lens that falls in the 75-300mm category any time soon.
So, my questions are:
(1) Is it worth it to get the 500D and steup up rings or just stick with the 250D ?
(2) More basic question: Which one (250D/500D) gives a better working distance ? (You can define "better" :D )
Appreciate the advice.