A FEW FROM MY FIRST TIME ASSISTING @ A WEDDING

[k-style]

SO I WAS ASSISTING MY FRIEND AND I MANAGED TO GET A FEW SHOTS, I HAVE A LOTTTT TO LEARN.... C&C APPRECIATED.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3284/2938590469_8d52ceceba.jpg?v=0http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3230/2939455678_5fec7c147b.jpg?v=0
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3279/2939458642_78a5200591.jpg?v=0http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3002/2938607423_9ae9181726.jpg?v=0
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3218/2938588221_4768a4f570.jpg?v=0
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3040/2939445460_0ef0395259.jpg?v=0
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3025/2939438558_5234210892.jpg?v=0
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3174/2938585685_48dff7229d.jpg?v=0

[k-style]

JUST TWO MORE....SRYYY!
THE KISS
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3250/2938584201_1396e60903.jpg?v=0
THE RING SHADOW (already posted but ill throw it in again)
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3059/2934432459_7e35e4dc64.jpg?v=0

[embdaw]

I really like #2 and the bride blowing the bubbles...I love how "sparkly" it looks. A few, like 1, 7, and 8 look underexposed.

[moeronn]

I think these are al pretty good captures, but I'll go a step further than Erin and say that all of them seem underexposed. Also, the white balance is off in a few of them.

It's a great start and these can be fixed in PP - hopefully you shot in RAW.

[DigitalSpecialist]

You did very well. And I agree with the aforementioned posters.

[shannyD]

these are really great photos.. a lot better than my first time around.. lol.. looks great!!

[Ziffle]

very nice compositions - nice set ...
agree w/ the previous post.

Looking forward to see more....

[k-style]

thank you guys, and for some reason i always tend to underexpose my shots....even when i do my PP i underexpose them....did this happen to any of you guys when you first strated shooting???....is like is more comforting to my eye to see pictures darker....this is why i am addicted to vignetting....any suggestions to break away from this habbit???....once again thank you for all the C&C

[moeronn]

I have a bad habit of underexposing when I shot, but usually fix it in post. One thing that should help is checking the histogram.

[k-style]

I have a bad habit of underexposing when I shot, but usually fix it in post. One thing that should help is checking the histogram.


thank you i need to practice reading the histogram. :oops:

[marcus769]

+1 on learning the histogram, but you're gonna do fine! Play with your camera some more and you'll understand it better.. Nice pics tho!

[David_J]

I find if I use back of the camera to just preview the image (and not the histogram), underexposed "looks better" when it actually isn't better. That little 3" screen isn't the best way to preview an image. However...using the histogram WILL tell how you how well the image was exposed. I now only chimp images with the histogram display on.

[k-style]

thank you guys for the tips