PDA

View Full Version : Telephoto L Lens Dilemma


mdr
21st of February 2005 (Mon), 03:04
I can't make up my mind between the 300mm f4 L IS or the 400mm f5.6 L telephoto prime. I'm interested in image quality using my 20D, particularly, which one of the following comparisons provides sharper images:

300mm f4 L IS or 400mm f5.6 L
300mm f4 L IS with 1.4x TC or 400mm f5.6 L
300mm f4 L IS with 2x TC or 400mm f5.6 L with 1.4x TC
I have considered the 100-400mm L IS lens, but see no need in this zoom, as I will always be using it at the 400mm end. And, I can't affor the faster 300mm or 400mm lenses.

pturton
21st of February 2005 (Mon), 06:30
Recently I faced the same decision and realized that each lens has its use. I was fortunate enough to be able to purchase both.

IMHO
300mm f4 L IS or 400mm f5.6 L - hard to tell which is sharper, they seem to be equal

300mm f4 L IS with 1.4x TC or 400mm f5.6 L - the 400 has a slight edge here but again it can be difficult to tell.

300mm f4 L IS with 2x TC or 400mm f5.6 L with 1.4x TC - the 400 is clearly better but the 300 +2x can give very acceptable results even handheld.

Other points to consider:
The 300 can focus to 5 feet vs 11 feet with the 400. Of course extension tubes could be used with the 400.

For off tripod usage, I think the 300 is the winner because of the IS.

For my usage which is usually a subject within 30 feet, more DOF is necessary and I stop down to f/8 to f11 so although I'd love to be own a f/2.8 lens, it would be overkill for my usage.

There are some pictures on my site that were taken using the 300 and 400. All pictures using the 300 are HH.

Paul
http://www.iaw.com/~pturton/

WestFalcon
21st of February 2005 (Mon), 06:46
Paul...you have some very nice pictures...I'm a zoology teacher so I really appreciate them

mdr
21st of February 2005 (Mon), 06:50
Thanks for the advice. I like your site.

Does 400 @ 560 imply it's the 400 with a 1.4x TC?

pturton
21st of February 2005 (Mon), 09:28
WestFalcon,
Thank you for the kudos.

mdr,
Thank you.

Yes, I use the Canon 1.4x MkII TC with the 400. In fact, I find that the 1.4x is often on the 400 and I am considering purchase of a second 1.4x for use with my 300.

If you know the approximate size of your subject and the probable distance to it, I made a spreadsheet in Excel 95 that I used to help decide on the focal lengths that I need to reasonably fill the frame on my 10D. http://www.iaw.com/~pturton/dpr/FOV_10D.xls


Paul

Neens_wa
21st of February 2005 (Mon), 10:44
Thanks! Lovely photos - those grandkids.. OMG! You are one lucky fella!

Great info! I'm another out here with the 100-400, 300, 400 dilemma!

BTW - Which lens are you using for your macro? I'm about to purchase a macro because I find I am just fascinated with things many seem to NOT notice - and a Macro is so fine for introducing that which we often don't notice.


neens

mdr
22nd of February 2005 (Tue), 02:58
Think his macro shots are taken with the Canon 100mm f2.8 macro lens. Can highly recommend this one.

Thanks for the spreadsheet. Very useful.

pturton
22nd of February 2005 (Tue), 06:08
Neens,
Thanks for the kind words. And yes, I am one very blessed fella with 10 grandchildren.

mdr is correct in the assumption that I used the Canon 100mm f/2.8 USM macro lens and for sure I highly recommend it also.

The spreadsheet quickly proved that all my lenses are too short. :)

Paul