smittymike19
2nd of March 2005 (Wed), 16:07
Ok. SO here is my story. I initially got into photography about 8 years ago. I bought a Nikon n70 just prior to digital cameras taking off. I wanted to get into photography, but with a regular slr, it was quite expensive to purchase film, develop etc.. for a lot of experimental pictures. Plus by the time the pictures came back I wasn’t sure what settings I had used to take the picture. So I basically stopped. Then a few years past, and digital cameras came down in price and I bought a canon s60?( I think was the model. It was about 600$ when I bought it) and I really felt like I was going to continue with the photography hobby. well I didn’t really. I was never really satisfied with the quality of the pictures. But we took 1000’s (and I mean 1000’s) of pictures of my newborn son. So here is the question. We just lost that camera and I am in the market for a new one. I am wondering if you would recommend the s1 or the 2x as expensive digital rebel. I am willing to pay for the rebel, as truth be told, I have never seen my digital camera even come close to the quality of my Nikon slr. Am I mistaken to believe that I will be unhappy with the s1? Is the rebel worth the price tag? IS something in between the 2 the answer? Thanks in advance..