PDA

View Full Version : Old stone church revisted


stoneylonesome
5th of March 2005 (Sat), 13:45
It was suggest that when I took this building I should have had a little more sky showing,
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=59684
so I went back today and did just that, I think it does work better.

http://www.bytegallery.com/data/3080/40HitchMus3.jpg

And seeing as how I managed to get out of the car for this one I thought I might as well take one of the front. :lol: :lol: This may at one time been a chruch it is now the Hitchcock Chair Museum.
http://www.bytegallery.com/data/3080/40HitchMus4.jpg

sparker1
5th of March 2005 (Sat), 15:47
Well, it's a beautiful building, and both shots are very nice.

stoneylonesome
5th of March 2005 (Sat), 18:17
Thanks for the comments Stan. There is some very neat old Victorian house in that village I'm going to see if I can get some of the better ones.

thomascanty
5th of March 2005 (Sat), 21:36
Nice looking church. You did a great job keeping it level in the second shot, too. For some reason, I always seem to have trouble with that. :lol:

pcasciola
5th of March 2005 (Sat), 22:52
Yes, I remember the other one. I think it definitely looks better this way. Good job.

Tom, I know what you mean. The only way I get a shot that level is if I rotate it in Photoshop.

Caimin
6th of March 2005 (Sun), 00:46
Cool shots, if you'll forgive the pun.

Reigh Higgins
6th of March 2005 (Sun), 05:22
Nice photos and church.

stoneylonesome
6th of March 2005 (Sun), 07:47
Nice looking church. You did a great job keeping it level in the second shot, too. For some reason, I always seem to have trouble with that. :lol:

It's really hard when your dealing with diminishing lines (the old vanishing point) at that angle, plus the conflicting lines of the mountain ridge, (yes that is a mountain in Connecticut :lol: ) and the general slope of the land. Sometimes if you set the camera on a tripod and had it perfectly level it would tend to make the subject look even more out of level. So there has to be a lot of compansation and a lot of luck in my opinion. That one wasn't so bad because there was a lot of conflicting lines. so the eye doesn't just pick out one. Does this make any sense?

thomascanty
6th of March 2005 (Sun), 09:19
Does this make any sense?

Makes sense to me. I won't comment about that "mountain" line, though... :lol:

stoneylonesome
6th of March 2005 (Sun), 11:24
Makes sense to me. I won't comment about that "mountain" line, though... :lol:

Thanks! they are kind of embarassing, I think the highest mountain CT is in the North Western section and it is a dizzying 2300' above sea level Have to get into Vermont and New Hampshire to attain any heighth and at the we're talking 4000' or so except MT. Washington in New Hampshire at over 6,000'

marie
7th of March 2005 (Mon), 15:25
I only saw these now :shock:

would have been mad to miss them Sandy
thank you very much

what beautiful shots
the church really looks well

really lovely shots and a beautiful building and setting
:cool:

stoneylonesome
7th of March 2005 (Mon), 15:43
I only saw these now :shock:

would have been mad to miss them Sandy
thank you very much

what beautiful shots
the church really looks well

really lovely shots and a beautiful building and setting
:cool:

Thanks Marie; See when you speak (type) I LISTEN! :lol: :lol: :lol: now go find the others I took OUT SIDE OF THE CAR this past weekend. :mrgreen: