PDA

View Full Version : My First HDR- What did I do wrong?


canonnoob
30th of November 2008 (Sun), 23:53
Okay some thing about this doesnt look good.. but for some reason I kinda like this... What do you guys think?

http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f177/davidlwelker/photoshops/Untitled_HDR2.jpg

Serrator
30th of November 2008 (Sun), 23:58
Dave,

I like it...but I am kinda bias since I live in Missouri!

So how did you go about creating this image?

canonnoob
1st of December 2008 (Mon), 00:01
lol i took three different exposures ( +1,0, -1) i was really just goofing around and didnt take it too seriously but thought hey what the heck... then merged them in PS and then messed with curves.

Other than some of the softness on some of the buildings, that is how it looked... It was misting last night...

canonloader
1st of December 2008 (Mon), 09:11
I like the effect. It does look like a painting. Almost. :)

canonnoob
1st of December 2008 (Mon), 09:33
Hey mitch what do you tihnk caused this? do you think it could have been the mist at all?

canonloader
1st of December 2008 (Mon), 09:53
No, it's probably from using PS. Did you use CS3? Download the free trial of Photomatix and try the same images in that. RAW's if you have them.

digirebelva
1st of December 2008 (Mon), 09:58
No, it's probably from using PS. Did you use CS3? Download the free trial of Photomatix and try the same images in that. RAW's if you have them.

Brings up a good question, is HDR good for night shots..I have tried it on a couple of occasions with less than stellar results...way to much noise in the dark areas, really have to darken it down to make it acceptable

canonloader
1st of December 2008 (Mon), 10:11
I haven't done any myself yet, living in a small town kind of restricts the options. But I have seen some very nice night shots posted here.

http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=586077

http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=583637

canonnoob
1st of December 2008 (Mon), 11:52
thanks for the ideas guys.. ill look up photomatrix and see what they come out with.. overall wht do you guys think?

canonloader
1st of December 2008 (Mon), 11:57
Personally, I like this shot, but I'd also like to see it done in Photomatix to see the difference. I would remember how I did this though, cause it's a very neat effect. :)

-Douglas-
1st of December 2008 (Mon), 12:00
Pretty cool and the way the arch is lighted kind of gives it a 3 dimensional feeling.

sapearl
1st of December 2008 (Mon), 12:02
Hi Dave - I really don't have a problem with it. Actually, I feel it's HDR that doesn't look like HDR which is a good think IMHO. Perhaps it's the totally black silhouette aspect of the buildings you don't like? That's probably just one of those unavoidable things unless you used a horrendously longer exposure ..... and then likely you would have run into other issues. - Stu

sapearl
1st of December 2008 (Mon), 12:04
Maybe the images weren't 100% completely aligned? I don't know, have done little myself so it's just a hunch :rolleyes:.

Hey mitch what do you tihnk caused this? do you think it could have been the mist at all?

canonnoob
1st of December 2008 (Mon), 12:09
Thanks for the opinons guys.. I appreciate it.

stathunter
1st of December 2008 (Mon), 12:13
Nice work!

canonnoob
1st of December 2008 (Mon), 12:23
i tried getting photomatix but it isnt letting me download- saying its malware.

canonnoob
1st of December 2008 (Mon), 12:23
Nice work!
thanks

canonloader
1st of December 2008 (Mon), 12:35
Download it here. (http://www.hdrsoft.com/download/win.html)

canonnoob
1st of December 2008 (Mon), 12:44
thats what I did... and when you click- download Version #, it takes me to a malware warning screen.

canonnoob
1st of December 2008 (Mon), 13:30
Here is the photomatix version... I took it into photoshop to do a quick sharpen and some noise reduction... I also did a tone map through photomatix

-Douglas-
1st of December 2008 (Mon), 13:39
Here is the photomatix version.

Where ?

SwiftFootTim
1st of December 2008 (Mon), 13:44
I like the look of it. Lately I've tried to remind myself that we are our own worst critic in most cases. Also, the lighting on the arch is extremely cool looking, definitely a 3-dish look.

canonnoob
1st of December 2008 (Mon), 15:05
Where ?

sorry My computer shut down on me.,.. here it is:

http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f177/davidlwelker/photoshops/Untitled_HDR2-2.jpg

canonloader
1st of December 2008 (Mon), 15:15
Nice. Once you are done in Photomatix though, you can then open the tif in CS3 and adjust it some more, save out as a jpg, then open that again and crop, resize noise reduction and sharpening. Then it's done. :)

-Douglas-
1st of December 2008 (Mon), 16:27
Wow, what an amazing difference, awesome!

canonnoob
1st of December 2008 (Mon), 16:28
i dont know which one i like more though...

randy.wick
1st of December 2008 (Mon), 19:06
Are all of the source images in focus? The softness in half of the arch is a little distracting.

CameraBuff
1st of December 2008 (Mon), 19:23
I like the first one very much, nice shot and pp.

canonnoob
1st of December 2008 (Mon), 19:55
Are all of the source images in focus? The softness in half of the arch is a little distracting.
yup im positive that they are all in focus...

Dark-Hawk
1st of December 2008 (Mon), 20:26
I like the effect you generated here by the first shot ... Reminds me of Sin City

SwiftFootTim
1st of December 2008 (Mon), 20:47
Boy, I don't know which one looks cooler. Both have their merits. I think that it would come down to what you want. The first one has a sort of dreamy feel to it, more art than pure photography. The second is more like a photo.

But dang, I can't decide which one is better.

canonnoob
1st of December 2008 (Mon), 23:11
thanks guys.,. I do appreciate it.