View Full Version : Picture taken at the beach
gbjune
22nd of July 2001 (Sun), 00:22
The Oregon coast might not have nice water, but sometimes it's fun to just bring a camera and walk around...
http://www.wsu.edu/~geir/pictures/small_1.jpg
Although, thanks to Canon's brilliant engineering, they put Auto for ISO since that was what the camera was set to. I'd be a bit happier if they set the EXIF information to whatever the picture actually ended up being taken at...
I had to go through and modify the sky, since noise in the blue was horrible. Not sure why...
Geir
mpkirby
24th of July 2001 (Tue), 06:17
This is pretty cool. Its got the "what's on the other side of the sand-dune" motif.
I wonder what it would look like in black & white? I think if you layed a piece of drift-wood across the path and printed it in B&W, you would have a famous photograph. (can't remember the photographer though....old age).
Try shooting it in Raw, instead of auto. The noise you were seeing might be JPEG artifacts. I use RAW exclusively now, and have pretty good deep blue skys. A little bit of noise, but you have to go hunting for it.
Mike
deeps
24th of July 2001 (Tue), 10:09
Geir,
I like the composition. May be if this was shot at dawn or dusk, with the reeds a golden hue,the impact would be even greater. Just a thought.
Mike,
Here's one I shot a while ago...
http://randomtrips.com/photos/index.html?id=3
Think I have a famous photo? :-)
gbjune
24th of July 2001 (Tue), 10:28
mpkirby wrote:
Try shooting it in Raw, instead of auto. The noise you were seeing might be JPEG artifacts. I use RAW exclusively now, and have pretty good deep blue skys. A little bit of noise, but you have to go hunting for it.
Mike
I did use RAW, that's part of the problem...
Even with RAW mode, the blue sky was speckled with red noise. It was really bad...
Then again, when watching on a 1280x1024/19" monitor, the picture is blown up substantially compared to a 6x4 or anything like that...
I'll try again this weekend, this time make sure it is ISO 50 and do some bracketing. See if that helps.
:)
converted to black and white (and did nothing to reduce noise)
http://www.wsu.edu/~geir/pictures/small2.jpg
Geir
Paul V
24th of July 2001 (Tue), 12:42
I don't see any noise in this B&W photo...
gbjune
24th of July 2001 (Tue), 13:27
Paul V wrote:
I don't see any noise in this B&W photo...
The noise seems to dissappear as part of the B&W conversion....
which I guess is good... Blue and red look similar in grey anyway, so this is to be expected...
Geir
John Smith
25th of July 2001 (Wed), 06:19
Great color management here. Congratulations.
mpkirby
27th of July 2001 (Fri), 16:23
> Mike,
> Here's one I shot a while ago...
>
> http://www.geocities.com/pradeepselvakumar/photos.html?id=3
>
> Think I have a famous photo? :-)
That's it!! That's the "look" I was thinking of.
A little sadness, end-of-summer kind of day. Everyone's gone but you. You're only left with memories.
The B&W looks good too. Did you just take the standard conversion? Or did you futz around with it. I like the contrast better than the B&W version above. The composition is good too. (notice, the destination is in the upper-left, not dead center...) Its kind of like you'r walking while looking at the ground. (sort of like most of us walk :-)
Mike
vBulletin® v3.6.7, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.