Zivnuska
5th of December 2008 (Fri), 12:45
Tried the (two) Alien Bee B800s for the first time last night. The Bees, PWs, and Vagabond IIs worker perfectly--my use of them left much to be desired. The first set of shots were from a very small gym. Four feet from baseline to wall, perhaps double that on the side wall. All shots taken from a doorway behind the bucket. I'm not concerned about the captures (nothing special there) but I am looking for suggestions on aiming the lights, f stops, ISO choice, etc. The small gym really made those lights effective--note I'm stopped down and still have low ISOs. This gym has a cathedral type ceiling. BTW, shooting at 1/320, 1/250 or even 1/200 seemed to make no difference because I was so far over ambient.
1. f/4.0, ISO 250
.
http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q225/zivnuska/_D3E1711.jpg
2. f/5.0, ISO 400
.
http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q225/zivnuska/_D3E1731.jpg
3. f/4.0, ISO 400
http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q225/zivnuska/_D3E1725.jpg
4. f/5.0, ISO 400
http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q225/zivnuska/_D3E1734.jpg
5. My little girl grabs a rebound--Can't see her face, or the ball, but she can jump! f/4.0, ISO 250, 1/320 Sec
http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q225/zivnuska/_D3E1713.jpg
The following shots were taken at the larger gym. No room behind the baseline, I had to shoot from a stage 4 feet behind the baseline and 4 feet above the floor. This gym has a flat and fairly low ceiling.
6. f/4.0, ISO 800
http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q225/zivnuska/_D3E1775.jpg
7. f/4.0, ISO 800 Light is stronger on one side of face. I'm not sure what to do about that. Note that lighting and exposure is the same on 6, 7, and 8. Number 6 looks evenly lit and the others don't. Why?
http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q225/zivnuska/_D3E1779.jpg
8. f/4.0, ISO 800 Note all the light falling on the stands and how the faces/hair are highlighted toward that side. I'm guessing that the light on this side needs to be aimed more toward the middle of the floor?
.http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q225/zivnuska/_D3E1796.jpg
In each gym, the strobes had to be placed about even with the baseline. They were aimed off the ceiling toward the free throw line. I've thought about bouncing them off the back wall/ceiling line angle instead of the way I did it. FWIW, ambient settings were f/2.2, 1/640, ISO 3200
Suggestions from all you strobists out there?
1. f/4.0, ISO 250
.
http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q225/zivnuska/_D3E1711.jpg
2. f/5.0, ISO 400
.
http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q225/zivnuska/_D3E1731.jpg
3. f/4.0, ISO 400
http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q225/zivnuska/_D3E1725.jpg
4. f/5.0, ISO 400
http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q225/zivnuska/_D3E1734.jpg
5. My little girl grabs a rebound--Can't see her face, or the ball, but she can jump! f/4.0, ISO 250, 1/320 Sec
http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q225/zivnuska/_D3E1713.jpg
The following shots were taken at the larger gym. No room behind the baseline, I had to shoot from a stage 4 feet behind the baseline and 4 feet above the floor. This gym has a flat and fairly low ceiling.
6. f/4.0, ISO 800
http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q225/zivnuska/_D3E1775.jpg
7. f/4.0, ISO 800 Light is stronger on one side of face. I'm not sure what to do about that. Note that lighting and exposure is the same on 6, 7, and 8. Number 6 looks evenly lit and the others don't. Why?
http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q225/zivnuska/_D3E1779.jpg
8. f/4.0, ISO 800 Note all the light falling on the stands and how the faces/hair are highlighted toward that side. I'm guessing that the light on this side needs to be aimed more toward the middle of the floor?
.http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q225/zivnuska/_D3E1796.jpg
In each gym, the strobes had to be placed about even with the baseline. They were aimed off the ceiling toward the free throw line. I've thought about bouncing them off the back wall/ceiling line angle instead of the way I did it. FWIW, ambient settings were f/2.2, 1/640, ISO 3200
Suggestions from all you strobists out there?