metsuyan
7th of March 2005 (Mon), 16:00
This may sound like a totally unorthodox / unprofessional kind of question but I'm gonna risk it here anyway.
Is there any correlation that can be made between the focal distance (mm) of a lens and the distance that one may be from a human subject. I know it depends on the size of the subject and what part(s) of the subject one wishes to include.
To make a really confusing question just a bit less confusing... here's the type of question I'm looking to answer and perhaps find a formula for.
The human subject is 5' tall (sorry to all you metric people) and I'm 100 feet away from the subejct. What mm lens would I need to have the subject fill most of the frame?
If there is a formula for this in some way, that would make me happy. I know all the stuff about angles and degrees etc... This just seems more direct but then again I may just be a bit nuts ;)
Thanks in advance for anyone who attempts to answer this one. I tried asking this question to a "pro" at a famous camera shop and he got all pissy bc "it's not the way things are done." Whatever!
Is there any correlation that can be made between the focal distance (mm) of a lens and the distance that one may be from a human subject. I know it depends on the size of the subject and what part(s) of the subject one wishes to include.
To make a really confusing question just a bit less confusing... here's the type of question I'm looking to answer and perhaps find a formula for.
The human subject is 5' tall (sorry to all you metric people) and I'm 100 feet away from the subejct. What mm lens would I need to have the subject fill most of the frame?
If there is a formula for this in some way, that would make me happy. I know all the stuff about angles and degrees etc... This just seems more direct but then again I may just be a bit nuts ;)
Thanks in advance for anyone who attempts to answer this one. I tried asking this question to a "pro" at a famous camera shop and he got all pissy bc "it's not the way things are done." Whatever!