View Full Version : Flash Bracket
eddie2197
15th of December 2008 (Mon), 06:11
Any suggestions on a flash bracket for a 40D with a grip?
Titus213
15th of December 2008 (Mon), 08:25
Budget?
http://www.newtoncamerabrackets.com/
545iBMW
15th of December 2008 (Mon), 11:37
+1 on the Newton. Get the folding bracket if you want a sturdy, compact bracket.
hawk911
15th of December 2008 (Mon), 11:46
Dang- I can't buy those without a HUGE budget!
coolshot
15th of December 2008 (Mon), 12:06
ebay flash bracket. Try that first its only $30 shipped.
545iBMW
15th of December 2008 (Mon), 12:10
Flash brackets are like tripods, you get what you pay for.
Titus213
15th of December 2008 (Mon), 12:15
Dang- I can't buy those without a HUGE budget!
And the Newton is a 'reasonable' price. Others are outrageous. I personally use a Stroboframe CameraFlip but it won't accommodate a camera with a grip without some modifications. I've never personally seen the need for a grip.
bobbyz
15th of December 2008 (Mon), 12:26
I use RRS wedding pro. Nice and cheaper if you have their L plate. Otherwise it is expensive but very well made as any RRS gear.
hawk911
15th of December 2008 (Mon), 12:51
I've got a $90 Stroboframe, and it will accomodate my grip. Only problem is it's a bit bulky. There's just no good way to hang onto the camera with your left hand; it's got a handle to use but then zooming gets to be an issue. Curtis and Benky N have a nice one- I never did ask what brand though.
Wilt
15th of December 2008 (Mon), 13:07
Few brackets can provide the combination of...
Sturdy
Able to accomodate dSLR with battery grip or 1D body height
Keeps flash over camera lens axis
Allows camera to rotate CCW to portrait orientation , so battery grip buttons stay on correct side
Does not force you to use a rotating flash head, to keep it pointed upward at the ceiling
Newton, RRS, Custom Brackets do all of the above. RRS and Custom Bracket costs more, weighs more, and are bulkier than the Newtons.
As was stated earlier, "Flash brackets are like tripods, you get what you pay for" and the Newton is the entry price for all the above features. Lower priced brackets sacrifice one or more of the above characteristics (including the lowest priced Custom Bracket)
eddie2197
15th of December 2008 (Mon), 15:14
Budget in the $100 range.
hawk911
15th of December 2008 (Mon), 15:20
this is what I have, and paid about $90 for it. Maybe an ebay purchase:
Stroboframe RL (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00009UTLP)
Phlymation
15th of December 2008 (Mon), 21:49
I have the Stroboframe Camera Flip (http://www.amazon.com/Stroboframe-Camera-Flip-Flash-Bracket/dp/B00009UTLU/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=photo&qid=1229398666&sr=1-2) bracket. My one criteria for a bracket was that the flash orientation stayed the same (camera rotates / flips rather than the flash rotating). The price isn't bad either.
Arthur K
19th of December 2008 (Fri), 18:39
Take a look at the "Press T " That is what i use. I do not like brackets that force you to hold them. I like to keep my hands on the camera. My camera has no grip flash is a 580.
The newton flash adapter will fit the "Press T" so your flash won't twist
Arthur
kenwood33
19th of December 2008 (Fri), 18:43
the foldable newton one is the best, there is nothing out there is even a close second
Bubble
19th of December 2008 (Fri), 18:52
Newton, RRS, Custom Brackets do all of the above. RRS and Custom Bracket costs more, weighs more, and are bulkier than the Newtons.
As was stated earlier, "Flash brackets are like tripods, you get what you pay for" and the Newton is the entry price for all the above features. Lower priced brackets sacrifice one or more of the above characteristics (including the lowest priced Custom Bracket)
not really. RRS bracket comes in 2 pieces. VERY LIGHT. Easy to take out and put away when travel. As for weight, it is YOUR FLASH that add the weight. :)
check this thread for picture:
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showpost.php?p=6838883&postcount=81
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showpost.php?p=6838886&postcount=82
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showpost.php?p=6838888&postcount=83
elitejp
19th of December 2008 (Fri), 19:49
thats an interesting setup. Im thinking of doing something like that myself. As it seems that an on camera flash makes the picture come out a little flat. How do you like using this type of bracket? Do you think it helps create a better photo (compared to having the flash on the hot shoe)?
Wilt
19th of December 2008 (Fri), 20:01
not really. RRS bracket comes in 2 pieces. VERY LIGHT. Easy to take out and put away when travel. As for weight, it is YOUR FLASH that add the weight. :)
check this thread for picture:
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showpost.php?p=6838883&postcount=81
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showpost.php?p=6838886&postcount=82
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showpost.php?p=6838888&postcount=83
I stand corrected, both RRS and Newton Flash Rotator come in at a very slim 8 oz.!
Michael64
20th of December 2008 (Sat), 10:10
I brought a Custom Brackets CB Junior and like it alot. Not heavy well made and easy to use landscape or portrait and it does interfer with use of camera functions.
Michael
F4 Cyborg
21st of December 2008 (Sun), 12:38
IF you have the RRS wedding pro and their receiver plate on both cameras you have slung, you can change from one camera to the other faster than you can change a lens. Twist screw, maybe a full turn, let camera go grab other, slid on twist screw done. You don't have your other camera swinging with flash and such smacking into you or other stuff. (wont break a flash off the bracket, having it crash to the sidewalk). No worries of blowing dust when changing lens. It's all in what you get use to.
ejicon
27th of January 2009 (Tue), 20:35
I need to look into all these brackets listed in this thread. Thanks guys
Wilt
27th of January 2009 (Tue), 20:38
IF you have the RRS wedding pro and their receiver plate on both cameras you have slung, you can change from one camera to the other faster than you can change a lens. Twist screw, maybe a full turn, let camera go grab other, slid on twist screw done. You don't have your other camera swinging with flash and such smacking into you or other stuff. (wont break a flash off the bracket, having it crash to the sidewalk). No worries of blowing dust when changing lens. It's all in what you get use to.
The Newton also features bayonet QR that allows you to move bracket and flash from one body to another very rapidly. Loosen the tightening knob, slide out the bayonet mounted on body 1, slide on the bayonet mounted on body 2, tighten the knob, aim and shoot.
KayakPhotos
30th of January 2009 (Fri), 13:37
I have been looking at the Newton brackets mentioned. I am focusing on the Di100 FR2 to be used on a 40D. I do not have a grip right now, but might get one in the future. I was wondering what the advantages/disadvantages are of having the camera rotation bracket vs. the flash rotator?
Wilt
30th of January 2009 (Fri), 14:44
I have been looking at the Newton brackets mentioned. I am focusing on the Di100 FR2 to be used on a 40D. I do not have a grip right now, but might get one in the future. I was wondering what the advantages/disadvantages are of having the camera rotation bracket vs. the flash rotator?
Camera rotator is easier to deal with on a tripod. The disadvantage is the weight of the camera rotator.
The flash rotator certainly is able to deal with or without the battery grip on the 40D. I don't know about the flash rotator, but I would assume it handles that fine.
mchong75
30th of January 2009 (Fri), 16:50
I have a perfect condition CUSTOM bracket for cheap sale. :)
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=630123&highlight=custom+bracket
Weddingguy1
30th of January 2009 (Fri), 19:07
I have been using the Lite-Scoop for over a year . . don't need a bracket anymore when I'm forced to shoot with the flash on camera.
check it out . . lighter and cheaper, and in my opinion . . .much better results!
http://www.litegenius.com
SYS
30th of January 2009 (Fri), 21:20
I have been using the Lite-Scoop for over a year . . don't need a bracket anymore when I'm forced to shoot with the flash on camera.
check it out . . lighter and cheaper, and in my opinion . . .much better results!
http://www.litegenius.com
That's $34.95, and this nearly identical one by Chuck Gardner costs less than $5. Someone decided to get an idea off someone else and decide to make some money, it seems...
http://super.nova.org/DPR/DIY01/
SYS
30th of January 2009 (Fri), 21:29
I have been using the Lite-Scoop for over a year . . don't need a bracket anymore when I'm forced to shoot with the flash on camera.
check it out . . lighter and cheaper, and in my opinion . . .much better results!
http://www.litegenius.com
Did YOU get this idea off Chuck Gardner and decided to patent it? At the bottom of your product link, it says "patent applied for."
vBulletin® v3.6.12, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.