avsfan
12th of March 2005 (Sat), 20:16
I have the Canon Digital Rebel 300D. The kit lense EF-S 18-55mm is a decent lens for the money, but it didn't take long to figure out I am very limited without an upgrade. I am pretty new to all of this so your advice and expertise is appreciated!
I was originally looking into just one replacement lense that would cover a wider range of what I shoot. I have come to the conclusion I would be better off getting 2 lenses to cover me. Any opinions?
I use my Digital Rebel for various pictures. I used it extensively when on vacation (example being Walt Disneyworld). I will use it take outdoor scenery pictures on the golf course or in the mountains when we go fishing/camping. People pictures of course, indoors and outdoors. Will probably start using it more for scenery pics, sunrises and sunsets, and maybe even some wildlife. I've used it some indoors at family gatherings. I've taken pics of my daughter's volleyball games, but that is coming to an end. I've also used it to take portrait style photos for my daughter and others.
I am strongly considering the EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS, USM as my normal walking-around lens. It still covers the wide-angle shots that I currently get with my 18-55, but covers me up to 85. And, the IS is a plus in this lens. It is a reasonable price at about $600. Any thoughts or opinions on this lens or others?
For a second lens I am looking at several possibilities.
EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 IS
EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 DO, IS
EF 70-200mm f/4.0 L
EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L
EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L, IS
My second lens would obviously be used for all those zoom shots I could never reach with my kit lens. Any thoughts or opinions here?
I appreciate the expertise of everyone on this board. It has been very informative so far. Thanks in advance for your help.
Steve
I was originally looking into just one replacement lense that would cover a wider range of what I shoot. I have come to the conclusion I would be better off getting 2 lenses to cover me. Any opinions?
I use my Digital Rebel for various pictures. I used it extensively when on vacation (example being Walt Disneyworld). I will use it take outdoor scenery pictures on the golf course or in the mountains when we go fishing/camping. People pictures of course, indoors and outdoors. Will probably start using it more for scenery pics, sunrises and sunsets, and maybe even some wildlife. I've used it some indoors at family gatherings. I've taken pics of my daughter's volleyball games, but that is coming to an end. I've also used it to take portrait style photos for my daughter and others.
I am strongly considering the EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS, USM as my normal walking-around lens. It still covers the wide-angle shots that I currently get with my 18-55, but covers me up to 85. And, the IS is a plus in this lens. It is a reasonable price at about $600. Any thoughts or opinions on this lens or others?
For a second lens I am looking at several possibilities.
EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 IS
EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 DO, IS
EF 70-200mm f/4.0 L
EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L
EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L, IS
My second lens would obviously be used for all those zoom shots I could never reach with my kit lens. Any thoughts or opinions here?
I appreciate the expertise of everyone on this board. It has been very informative so far. Thanks in advance for your help.
Steve