View Full Version : 3rd party flash(s) comaprable to 430ex?
babekha_2
4th of January 2009 (Sun), 17:46
Is there another company that sells a flash like the 430ex or 520ex by Canon? And in your opinion, how do they perfrom compared to the Canon flashes?
Grentz
4th of January 2009 (Sun), 17:51
I think Sigma probably comes the closest with their line of flashes
http://sigma4less.com/shoe-mount-flashes.html
ooo
4th of January 2009 (Sun), 18:04
Prices are pretty good there for canon flashes. I remember checking that site a while back and shipping costs killed the deal, but it seems even with shipping $210 for a brand new 430ex is pretty good. I mean used ones sell about $200 on this forum. Thanks for the link Grentz :D
xMClass
4th of January 2009 (Sun), 18:35
You can get some decent deals on some old 550EX's and 420EX's. Heck even a 380EX could still have some potential.
babekha_2
4th of January 2009 (Sun), 18:49
Adorma has the 430ex for $200 new :-) I think I'll go with that. I at least know the quality of them
Thanks for the link grentz, they have great prices, but Adorma has free shipping. You can't beat that!
ooo
4th of January 2009 (Sun), 18:56
I fail at shopping, haha. Good thing I'm not in the market for a new flash at the moment.
Scott Vogan
4th of January 2009 (Sun), 19:26
Is there another company that sells a flash like the 430ex or 520ex by Canon? And in your opinion, how do they perfrom compared to the Canon flashes?
Nissin is a brand out there boasting they are Ettl compatible. I don't have one, I am actually considering getting one as they are a bit cheaper...... but everyone always is saying you get what you pay for ! I think the Nissin 622i is compatible with or between the 430 and 580 as for power. But $170 VS $370 for a 580 ex2 is $ 200 saving.... you can get 2 of these for the price of one !
Anyone have any REAL TIME experience with these and do they work wireless like they SAY they do with the 580 ?
Scott.
40Dude6aedyk
4th of January 2009 (Sun), 21:13
I have both a genuine Canon 580 EXII and a genuine Sigma EF-530 DG Super. The Sigma cost $215 and does practically everything the 580EX II does. The Sigma can be used as a master or a slave, and does a few things the Canon cannot do.
The thing that is missing is that my Canon 40D does not recognize the Sigma as a master flash, so I need to use the buttons on the Sigma itself to use it as a master. I will say that I do not use it as a master since I have the Canon 580EX II which does a better job as a master. The 580EX II or the camera itself can control the Sigma as a slave in either ETTL or manual mode.
Scott Vogan
5th of January 2009 (Mon), 08:40
.... Sigma EF-530 ....... The 580EX II or the camera itself can control the Sigma as a slave in either ETTL or manual mode.
I am going to consider that. That is some great info, thanks. I wasn't aware of this Sigma model. It is just slightly less powerful than the Canon 580, so that would be a better choice over an off brand unit ! I have a Sigma lens that I just LOVE ... almost as much as my Canon EF-S..... almost :lol: !
GUIDE NUMBER COMPARISONS : You check the price, I am not advertising.... I know what one I am getting. :)
Nissin 622 144 ft @ ISO100, @ 105mm
Sigma EF-530 174 ft @ ISO100, @ 105mm
Canon 580 EXII 190 ft @ ISO100, @ 105mm
Canon 430 EXII 141 ft @ ISO100, @ 105mm
Thanks again !
Scott
babekha_2
5th of January 2009 (Mon), 16:02
sorry, I don't have a flash so I'm not sure. . . whats the difference between master and slave?
Thanks for email Scott, I will look into thos
Grentz
5th of January 2009 (Mon), 16:17
Master is the unit that is controlling the slaves.You will have one master and one or more slaves controlled by the single master in a multiflash setup. With Canon flashes, the 420/430ex work as slaves only while the 550/580ex work as Masters or Slaves.
This is just for using multiple flashes though, all work mounted to the hot shoe directly.
Wilt
5th of January 2009 (Mon), 16:29
Is there another company that sells a flash like the 430ex or 520ex by Canon? And in your opinion, how do they perfrom compared to the Canon flashes?
Metz 44AF4C would be Canon wireless compatible and a bit more powerful, and (in Auto mode) a much more reliable, exposure-wise.
tkbslc
5th of January 2009 (Mon), 23:44
Sunpak PZ42xc is really close, but lacks High speed sync. Really only an issue if you'll be using it outdoors at high shutter speed. It is about $50 cheaper
Sigma 530 ST is a bit cheaper, but lack the manual controls and high speed sync.
ssracer
5th of January 2009 (Mon), 23:46
Good prices on that first posted site
KPBara
6th of January 2009 (Tue), 09:55
Sunpak PZ42xc is really close, but lacks High speed sync. Really only an issue if you'll be using it outdoors at high shutter speed. It is about $50 cheaper
Sigma 530 ST is a bit cheaper, but lack the manual controls and high speed sync.
Could you comment on how these two flashes compare?
I like the Sunpak's small size but read somewhere that it may have compatibility issues?
Also, I thought the Sigma 530 has manual controls.
tkbslc
6th of January 2009 (Tue), 12:08
Could you comment on how these two flashes compare?
I like the Sunpak's small size but read somewhere that it may have compatibility issues?
Also, I thought the Sigma 530 has manual controls.
This particular Sunpak is not any smaller than a 430EX. it is fully compatible with any ETTL canon camera. You may be thinking of some of the older models.
The 530 Super has lots of manual controls, but costs MORE than a 430EX. The cheap version, the 530 ST has very limited manual controls. For, example, the flash output only has 2 settings. 1/16 and full.
KPBara
6th of January 2009 (Tue), 13:15
This particular Sunpak is not any smaller than a 430EX. it is fully compatible with any ETTL canon camera. You may be thinking of some of the older models.
The 530 Super has lots of manual controls, but costs MORE than a 430EX. The cheap version, the 530 ST has very limited manual controls. For, example, the flash output only has 2 settings. 1/16 and full.
Thanks. I didn't realize the 530 ST had no other settings between 1/16 and full. The Sunpak would seem a better value, then. Would you know if it is as powerful? The Sunpak's GN is 42M at 35mm. How does that compare to the Sigma's 53M at 105mm?
Regarding size, I was just noting that the Sunpak is 9 oz and the Canon almost 12 oz.
vBulletin® v3.6.12, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.