PDA

View Full Version : Review: Really Right Stuff BH-55


Greg_C
6th of January 2009 (Tue), 17:03
I've recently switched from a Manfrotto 488RC2 head to the Really Right Stuff BH-55 with B2 AS II clamp and the Arca Swiss system. I kept the Manfrotto legs so the BH-55 is mounted on my Manfrotto 190ProB. For now the Manfrotto legs will suffice but I do plan to upgrade those at some stage also.

Why did I change? I use a tripod a lot more that most for my macro shots and the droop with the old ball head was starting to be an issue. How many people have see the subject shift in the viewer when they tightened up the ballhead? This is what I was experiencing with the 488 and I was compensating for this each time I tightened the ballhead. With a good tripod and head I can often lower the shutter speed to 1/60sec when using my 180 and full set of Kenko tubes. I then get a better natural colour in the background and the flash is less noticeable. The PCL-1 Panning Clamp and Mini-Clamp Package will also be worth while additions as I plan to do more landscapes and panoramas.

BH-55 Specs
Weight 0.725kg (1.6lb)
Load capacity 22kg (50lb)

You will read around the web that many consider the load capacity quoted by RRS for the BH-55 to be on the low side and i tend to agree. It probably can take more but these are their figures.

Price
Ouch! RRS gear is expensive. This falls into to you get what you pay for category, this type of equipment is truly an investment that will last for many years.

Details
When you take delivery of a any RRS gear you can immediately appreciate the craftsmanship that goes into their equipment. The BH-55 comes with a bag to protect it - a nice addition to help protect your investment. The next thing you notice is how big the BH-55 is, that said, it's shorter than most other ballheads in the class.

It easily fitted onto the 190ProB in a minute. The base of the BH-55 is a little bigger than the top plate on the 190ProB. Though this might look a little odd when you look at it closely it doesn't present any problems.

BH-55 mounted on Manfrotto 190Pro
http://www.steadyhands.net/review/image40166.jpg

The first thing to say is --- it doesn't creep or droop. The 488 used to suffer from droop, but the BH-55 is rock solid. This is part of what makes it special. The ballhead in the BH-55 has to be about 2x the size of the ball head in the 488. The BH-55 locks the ball into place with a side clamping mechanism, most other ballheads clamp from the bottom. The BH-55 has a pan knob, ball head knob and a drag knob. With the drag knob you adjust the drag tension on the ball, you can then adjust the ball without the main ball knob being totally tight. Like this it will hold a 100-400 on a gripped body and you can still adjust the position of the lens.

BH-55 fitted with B2 AS II
http://www.steadyhands.net/review/image40167.jpg

The Arca Swiss plates fit perfectly into the clamps. I chose to go with the leaver release clamps. The leaver has three positions, locked, partially open, fully open. In the fully open position you can insert the lens plate easily. In the partially open position you can slide the lens plate from side to side. The RRS plates have a very small screw at either end and this stops the travel so the plate will not totally slide out of the clamp. When locked, there is no movement in the lens or body plate. As a comparison, there always was a little play in my Manfrotto RC2 plates and clamps.

A note about the Lever Release clamps. When I purchased the BH-55 as a complete package it comes with the B2 AS II Lever Release Clamp. This clamp is designed to fit onto the BH-55 with a countersunk screw from the top and has no thread internally - it comes fitted like this. The B2 LR II by comparison has the countersink drilling AND the 3/8 thread.

As you can see from the weight listed above it's a little on the heavy side compared to some of the other Arca Swiss ball heads. The link at the bottom has a comparison of the weights of the more common ball heads. This is probably not the head to choose if you are looking for a light weight travel solution. ie This is probably not the ballhead you are going to take on a long trek when you are carting all of the equipment yourself.

Length of BH-55 on 190Pro
This is shot will give you an idea about the length of this combination. Call it 26".

http://www.steadyhands.net/review/image40165.jpg

I've also added a BGE2-L40 L plate to the 40D and have quickly adjusted to this being fitted to the camera. It's nicely contoured and I hardly notice it on the body, a very big improvement over the ergonomics of the Manfrotto L plate. I leave the body plate fitted to the camera all of the time. During the Christmas holidays this proved to be a good idea. At one stage I grabbed the camera and tripod and raced to the beach to catch a huge Supercell Storm. Having the plate on already meant I was instantly ready to shoot the pano in landscape or portrait. I was not wanting to expose myself to a lightning strike so time was important. The result is here (http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=621902).


I kept the Manfrotto 486 ball head on my monopod but switched the plate to a RRS B2 LRII. The RC2 plate simply unscrews and I screwed on the RRS B2 LR. With the addition of a little Loctite Blue I was done. RRS doesn't recommend leaver releases on monopod so I'll see how I go with this.

Here's a shot of the head along with some extra's used for panos. A friend here put it quite well.

So you've got your camera fitted to the L-bracket which sits in a clamp, which sits in a clamp, which attaches to a rail that sits in a pano clamp with a plate attached that fits into a QR clamp on top of the ball head?Even with all of this it is very stable. I won't be using it like this photo every day, normally I wouldn't have the CL-1 Panning Clamp and Mini-Clamp Package attached.

Pano Setup
http://www.steadyhands.net/review/image39168.jpg


Conclusion
I've now been using this for about two months with no problems. It is a lot easier to switch from landscape to portrait mode with the L plate attached to the camera and the directness with which the plates and clamps fit together is great. To conclude, I'm totally satisfied with my purchase of Really Right Stuff equipment and would recommend it to anyone.

Further Reading

Really Right Stuff BH-55
http://reallyrightstuff.com/ballheads/02.html

A comparison of popular Arca Swiss Ballheads
http://www.websiteoptimization.com/speed/tweak/ballhead/

An excellent article on tripods
http://bythom.com/support.htm

harv3589
6th of January 2009 (Tue), 18:35
Great review....I have the exact same set up you have in the last pic with the pano set-up, except that mine is ontop of a Manfrotto 055PROB. RRS does live up to its name, no would be disappointed in buy anything they manufacture.

ben_r_
6th of January 2009 (Tue), 19:08
Awesome! Make sure this makes it into the tripod sticky!!! Great job!

P1X4R
6th of January 2009 (Tue), 19:19
nice write-up. it's exactly the reason i switched over from the 488RC2 ballhead system. RRS definitely is quality but you do pay for it.

i also have two of their L brackets which are excellently designed but the one i have for my 1DmkIII has a problem with Canon's remote switch (RS-80N3) in portrait position. i ended up using an older generic made one with a smaller "head" that fits better with the B2 AS II clamp. i tried spacing it but i wanted a tighter fit.

MDJAK
6th of January 2009 (Tue), 19:24
Excellent writeup with great pictures. too.

May I make a comment or two. I too own this fine ballhead. My experience has been slightly different though.

I find the head does suffer from a very small amount of creep. At least mine does.

I find the drag control could be better. In a direct comparison with my friend's Markins Q20, the Markins had a better feel to the drag and handled a large telephoto better, though I'd rather use my sidekick which would be fine.

The RRS has two slots to drop portrait mode, while the Markins has one.

It is quite a bit heavier than the Markins, but that's neither here nor there to me. An extra pound never makes a difference to me.

Again, great job. The only other thing I'd say is RRS has amazing customer service. Very responsive and personal attention.

mark

bps
6th of January 2009 (Tue), 20:39
Greg,

Outstanding review! Thank you for taking the time to do this. Many will benefit from your effort!

Bryan

jhom
6th of January 2009 (Tue), 22:24
Nice review. Now that you have a top dog ballhead system, you need a top dog legset to reap the full performance of the BH55.

Clearie
6th of January 2009 (Tue), 22:49
Great review, I have the same ballhead setup with a Gitzo 1548.

Greg_C
6th of January 2009 (Tue), 23:06
Thanks folks.

Mark, you raise a couple of good points. I'll also add a shot of the ballhead showing the notches.

I've sent a PM to get it added tot eh Sticky.

René Damkot
7th of January 2009 (Wed), 02:29
Nice review. Added :)

Meaty0
10th of January 2009 (Sat), 21:28
Very comprehensive review Greg. And now that I've seen it in action, I must have one! :-D

Seriously though, the Manfrotto 488RC2 of mine is starting to droop a bit too, with all the gear I'm stacking onto it. I had done some research on this last year and it came down to the Markins or the RRS. I like the service from RRS. Answered all my questions very promptly.

bobcan
17th of January 2009 (Sat), 05:45
Outstanding Effort here.. and YES, you DO get what you pay for don't you..??!!

Lotus Man
18th of January 2009 (Sun), 10:23
nice job

gooble
12th of February 2009 (Thu), 13:20
I have the same legs, 488RC2 head and camera that you have and have just been researching RRS gear and I plan on getting the exact setup that you got so this review is perfectly timed. Thanks.

I have a question about the lever release. Does it have a safety like the 488RC2? What if yo catch it on something will it open? I watched a video on the RRS website and it didn't look like there was any safety on it. My biggest question now is whether to get the lever release or the knob one.

Jannie
19th of May 2009 (Tue), 09:57
Wow, this is exciting me, I want the RSS 55 head but was wondering at least for now if it would work on my 055MF4 tripod. I might get heavier Gitzo legs as well but this way I can plan that for later on and at least have part of the system.

jacobsen1
19th of May 2009 (Tue), 10:05
nice PCL-1... Any sample panos? (off to check your link now)

Greg_C
19th of May 2009 (Tue), 13:42
I have the same legs, 488RC2 head and camera that you have and have just been researching RRS gear and I plan on getting the exact setup that you got so this review is perfectly timed. Thanks.

I have a question about the lever release. Does it have a safety like the 488RC2? What if yo catch it on something will it open? I watched a video on the RRS website and it didn't look like there was any safety on it. My biggest question now is whether to get the lever release or the knob one.
No safety catch on the leaver release. It is tucked a fair way around the plate and I've never had a issue with something catching on it. They do recomend you use a knob on the plate for a monopod, probably because you are more likely to catch it on something as you are carting it around. If you did catch the leaver release solidly behind something you could open it up but the leaver has to flip almost 180deg around before the plate releases from the clamp so it's not that likely.

I prefer the leaver release to the knob, the panning head has the knob and it is a little slower to use.

Jannie
19th of May 2009 (Tue), 17:25
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/569162-REG/Gitzo_GT2942_GT2942_Basalt_Tripod_Legs.html#specif ications

Is anyone familiar with the Basalt legs, I know they make a 3 series but I haven't found anyone who carries them. The link for the middle sized ones I posted above are suppose to be able to handle 22 pounds which should make it pretty sturdy. I do want the center column for table top but if I take it outdoors I'd like to be able to remove the column. To date, I've used a tripod for mostly table top and portrait shooting and would prefer a larger head simply from an operational point of view and if the legs are a little heavier that is okay, I don't however want something that is cumbersome. My Brother works with the RSS heads and absolutely loves them. Eventually I'd also like to get the L plate for my MKIII.

Jannie
19th of May 2009 (Tue), 17:57
Well I just ordered the 55 head with the lever release and an L bracket for my MKIII. Will use it for a while on my Manfrotto 055MF4 legs until I can afford the Gitzo GT 3531 legs. Actually I've realized when shooting table top I don't even use the bottom extension on the legs and not all of the next extension either so I'm feeling pretty good about this. I figured the weight will be close to 5 3/4 lbs with the new head on my o55MF4 if I take out the center column if I want to use it for travel and with the head on it's going to be 25" long but of course the head can be taken off and then the legs alone are almost 21 1/5".

Jannie
20th of May 2009 (Wed), 16:39
Well here I am again, I tend to work at something until I'm satisfied. I bought a Basalt medium Gitzo from my store, a very nice tripod. Got home and I felt I just wanted to have something heavier under that RSS BH-55LR so I went back and exchanged it for the Gitzon GT 3551, it is soooooo sweet, this is my brothers favorite setup and he kind of tried to coach me into this from the beginning but this much for a tripod is pretty hard to stomach. But then again I expect to use this forever and now it's done, just got notice that RRS just shipped the head so now I wait...