PDA

View Full Version : Kata DR-465 Bag Review (Pictures Coming Soon)


Tumeg
15th of January 2009 (Thu), 13:06
Last Monday, I got the Kata DR-465 photo "rucksack." I got it, as an upgrade (well, more of a downgrade) from the Lowepro Slingshot 300 AW. I decided to switch out the Lowepro bag for the Kata, because the Lowepro was just too big, bulky, and heavy for my taste. It was way bigger than I needed it to be, and, I didn't really like the one strap (I have gone through every type of bag, and I have finally settled on backpacks). After much deliberation, I ordered the DR-465, new, on eBay.

When I first opened it, and started putting my stuff in the bag, at first, I was disappointed; at first I didn't really like the layout, especially the camera compartment. But after a few days, the layout is growing on me, and it isn't as much of a problem for me as it was. Everything I needed the bag to hold, it holds, with some extra room. It currently is holding:
-Canon EOS 40D w/ 17-40mm f/4L Attached
-Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM
-Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM
-Canon 430EX Speedlite
-Extras (Batteries, memory cards, iPod, wireless flash triggers, etc.)

With all of this, there is still just enough room for one more prime. There is probably just enough room to add a 135mm f/2L (4" tall, 3.3" diameter). If you need this bag to hold a telephoto (the largest lens this bag can hold, is probably the 70-200mm f/4L IS), it will work, but (in my case), I would have to take out the flash, in order to have enough room for the telephoto. There is also room in the above compartment, to hold an extra camera body (no grip), and a lens or two (depending on the size). So, it holds a lot more than I expected.
One slight con I have with the bag, is, I can not fit the 40D w/ 17-40mm attached, with the hood on the lens (reversed). That makes the end of the lens just a bit too wide to fit in the bag (with the rest of the gear). It fits, but, it takes too much pressure\effort to pull it out, and I am not comfortable putting that amount of stress\pressure on the flimsy hood. But, there is room in one of the other front compartments to store the hood for when I need it.

I am still working on getting use to the camera compartment of the bag; you unzip it, and then you pull it out, and it sort of slants out. (Some people describe it has a "hinged bucket") This can get pretty annoying, because sometimes when pulling the camera out (with the hood attached to the lens, at least), the compartment comes\tilts out so much, that you need two hands and something to support the bag, to push the compartment back into the bag. But, if you are laying the backpack down on it's back when using the camera compartment of the bag, this is no big deal.

The DR-465 does not have a laptop compartment, but the slightly more expensive 467 does. The DR-467 is the same exact bag, as the DR-465, just it has an extra slot in the back for a laptop. (I believe Kata says it can hold up to a 13" laptop, but people can easily fit their 15" MacBook Pros into the laptop compartment of the DR-467).

I currently have no pictures to go along with this review, but I will try to post some in the near future.
Compared to the Lowepro Slingshot 300 AW, and my needs, I give this bag a 4 out of 5.

**UPDATE** I totally forgot to talk about the comfort of this bag!
This bag has GREAT support. It has the two main straps (like any backpack), which are padded (along with the back of the bag, which is also padded), and on the two main straps, are two "support" straps. One clips over your chest, the other right around your waste. These really help to distribute the weight, and they keep the main straps from sliding apart\off your shoulders (at least for me).
This bag is SO comfortable to carry, especially compared to my previous Lowepro Slingshot 300 AW. That bag had very little padding, and not much support, and it made my shoulder sore after an hour of carrying it.

MeNiS
15th of January 2009 (Thu), 14:39
i have the dr-467, and i have no problem at all fitting my 30D with 17-55mm attached, with lens hood reversed. unless the specs of the 465 and 467 is significantly different, i can't see why you would have trouble with your 40D and 17-40? how are you putting it in?

as for the telephoto, you are correct that the 70-200 f/4 is probably the largest lens it will take upright. here's a photo
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v123/menis/IMG_4330.jpg

Tumeg
15th of January 2009 (Thu), 14:41
i have the dr-467, and i have no problem at all fitting my 30D with 17-55mm attached, with lens hood reversed. unless the specs of the 465 and 467 is significantly different, i can't see why you would have trouble with your 40D and 17-40? how are you putting it in?

I am putting it in, lens first.
It fits, but like I said, it is a tight fit.
It is because of my 2 other lenses and flash, that I have in the camera section of the bag also.
I will try re-arranging everything to see if I can get it to fit.

SuzyView
15th of January 2009 (Thu), 16:54
Glad you got the bag! I love mine. The 24-70 on the 5D just fits in that compartment with just one more lens and some accessories. It's a great bag. Very comfy. I'm glad you like it.

Tumeg
15th of January 2009 (Thu), 18:26
Glad you got the bag! I love mine. The 24-70 on the 5D just fits in that compartment with just one more lens and some accessories. It's a great bag. Very comfy. I'm glad you like it.


Yes, VERY comfortable (I forgot to mention that, lol)
So much padding in the back and on the straps. The two other straps, across the two main ones, are very nice.. They really do make the bag easier to carry.
Compared to the Lowepro Slingshot 300 AW, this bag is heaven, to carry..

SuzyView
15th of January 2009 (Thu), 19:30
I like those two front added straps as well. They are perfect to adjust and to make the weight easier. I have the tan color one and it looks like a nice day pack for me. But I like the look of the black one.

newb2pro_1day_or_so
22nd of March 2009 (Sun), 21:14
Will this bag handle my XT and 50D plus 3 lenses? The B&H review says it can but I want to be 100% sure before I buy it. Thanks.

hecster
22nd of March 2009 (Sun), 22:35
I just got one of these as well. i was able to stuff a 10d with a grip and a 24-105L attached into the lower compartment but it was a very tight fit. now i'm trying to find a nice tripod that i can strap onto the side of it. Any recommendations on a decent, not too bulky, tripod in the casual photographer price range?

newb2pro_1day_or_so: if you put the XT body in the upper compartment, you should be fine. any 3 particular lenses you're referring to?

newb2pro_1day_or_so
22nd of March 2009 (Sun), 22:40
I have the 28-135 kit lense for 50D, 100mm macro, 50mm F1.8, and 18-55 kit for xt. I guess that's four, haha. I also have a box of extention tubes and a flash for macro I'll need to squeeze in there. This is sounding like it's going to be very tight or not at all.

deirdrec
13th of April 2009 (Mon), 21:22
Do you have to take the entire bag off to get out your camera or a lens?

hecster
13th of April 2009 (Mon), 23:18
yes. or flip the bag around and wear backward with one strap.

1downfall
12th of January 2010 (Tue), 10:31
I have been looking at this bag for a while now. I don't like my 8Mil much for walking around. I really miss my Tamrac Exp 5 but it was also to big for daily walk stuff.
Will this bag hold a 50D Gripped? Most likely I would have my 11-16 2.8 and my 70-200 f4 IS or 135 L. thanks

hecster
12th of January 2010 (Tue), 13:43
gripped you will lose at least half of one of the 3 compartment sections.