mchong75
21st of January 2009 (Wed), 21:43
I got my Westcott Apollo 28" x 28" softbox today.
I didn't have anyone to test this out today so I snapped few stuff around the house.
I'm bit new to using a softbox, so would love to know if #1, #2 or #3 has a better lighting.
I'm testing the flash output, aperture, ISO and the softbox distance from the subject to get the right lighting.
I like the result of #1. But, is it too harsh?
1
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3268/3216371975_41172b4c5d.jpg
2
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3369/3216373051_534f896ac4.jpg
3
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3405/3216374019_b252369f4a.jpg
I didn't have anyone to test this out today so I snapped few stuff around the house.
I'm bit new to using a softbox, so would love to know if #1, #2 or #3 has a better lighting.
I'm testing the flash output, aperture, ISO and the softbox distance from the subject to get the right lighting.
I like the result of #1. But, is it too harsh?
1
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3268/3216371975_41172b4c5d.jpg
2
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3369/3216373051_534f896ac4.jpg
3
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3405/3216374019_b252369f4a.jpg