PDA

View Full Version : Two Yellow Jacket Insects


Kenny Adams
29th of March 2005 (Tue), 21:40
Both of these images were taken with the Canon 20D - EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM lens.

http://www.kandjsupplies.com/___yellow_jacket.jpg

http://www.kandjsupplies.com/___yellow_jacket_2.jpg
Copyright Kenny Adams

IanWeatherburn
29th of March 2005 (Tue), 23:02
Great photos Kenny. Such clarity and beautiful DOF. Well done.
I have the same camera (which I love), but that Macro lens looks like it rocks! Mmmmm...:lol:

tupe
30th of March 2005 (Wed), 04:39
nice!

Andy_T
30th of March 2005 (Wed), 10:51
Yikes!

Scary but good pictures.

Best regards,
Andy

Mills
30th of March 2005 (Wed), 12:17
Number 2 is fantastic.

xrunner123
31st of March 2005 (Thu), 21:40
May I ask how far away were you from the subject?

Kenny Adams
31st of March 2005 (Thu), 22:57
I was about 8" away from the subject. Here is another one that turned out pretty good:

http://www.kandjsupplies.com/yellow_jacket_3.jpg
Copyright Kenny Adams

Kenny Adams
31st of March 2005 (Thu), 22:58
-

rosie777
31st of March 2005 (Thu), 23:12
Those pictures are making my flesh crawl :shock: They must be good, but I can't bring my self to look at them any longer.

Rosie (completely irrational flying bug phobia)

skifly
1st of April 2005 (Fri), 15:15
These images may not be copied, distributed, altered or used in any manner. Copyright Kenny Adams

I'm sure you're proud of these pics, but you sound very arrogant in thinking that someone would want to steal these reduced resolution pics.
The first one is nice, but the second one's leg is clipped and a bit fuzzy.

Kenny Adams
1st of April 2005 (Fri), 17:16
Im sorry skifly. I will fix that for you so I dont sound so "arrogant" or proud. I am a contributer on a stock photography website and I have to be sure that my images are protected.

JAZZ D.P.G.
1st of April 2005 (Fri), 19:06
I'm sure you're proud of these pics, but you sound very arrogant in thinking that someone would want to steal these reduced resolution pics.
The first one is nice, but the second one's leg is clipped and a bit fuzzy.

Im sorry skifly. I will fix that for you so I dont sound so "arrogant" or proud. I am a contributer on a stock photography website and I have to be sure that my images are protected.

Easy guys.

I am not a fan of these little beasties, but they are not the only things that sting:rolleyes: (see quotes) (Kenny, you may look into watermarking your shots, easy way to copyright mark.)

I like the second shot, good detail and great colour.

Keep up the good work:)

ATHiker95
2nd of April 2005 (Sat), 08:15
All I can say, is that you are a brave soul. I've been stung by these fellows before - whew,baby! The 100mm Macro is a nice lens - really small dof when you're this close which makes it a tough lens to use, especially if a subject is moving. You did a good job considering that it probably was moving a bit - what was your exif info?

Kenny Adams
2nd of April 2005 (Sat), 12:27
All I can say, is that you are a brave soul. I've been stung by these fellows before - whew,baby! The 100mm Macro is a nice lens - really small dof when you're this close which makes it a tough lens to use, especially if a subject is moving. You did a good job considering that it probably was moving a bit - what was your exif info?

http://kandjsupplies.com/_forum_image_info_reply.gif

Bruce Hamilton
2nd of April 2005 (Sat), 18:19
I'm sure you're proud of these pics, but you sound very arrogant in thinking that someone would want to steal these reduced resolution pics.

Spoken by a photographer who's never had his photographs stolen... Even a low resolution photograph is printable up to the maximum size allowed by the resolution used. You can't fault Kenny for wanting to protect his work, most photographers would do the same.

mdm
2nd of April 2005 (Sat), 18:20
Quick! SMASH them little suckers before they find me.....

Kenny Adams
2nd of April 2005 (Sat), 20:50
Spoken by a photographer who's never had his photographs stolen... Even a low resolution photograph is printable up to the maximum size allowed by the resolution used. You can't fault Kenny for wanting to protect his work, most photographers would do the same.


Thank Bruce, I appreciate it.