View Full Version : Spring Time Macro
D Boone
31st of March 2005 (Thu), 07:03
Ok, well its getting warmer, so I am trying to get ready to do some macro photography of wildflowers and bugs. Has anyone flipped their kit lens like this?
http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=007m6Z
Should I buy an extention tube and close up filters? Should I just buy a 65mm Canon macro lens for $$$800? Or the 100 for less and extention tubes? I would really like to get into extreme close ups, mostly of insects. Whats the best route to go?
jacob
31st of March 2005 (Thu), 07:09
Get the 100mm macro. You dont need an extention tube becauce the 100mm is 1:1 (as is the 65mm). With the 100mm you get a better working area. I plan to buy one soon.
D Boone
31st of March 2005 (Thu), 07:12
I don't mind having a dedicated macro lens... I keep thinking with the 100, I will get 1:1, but the 65 says it goes from 1:1 - 5:1!
sid
31st of March 2005 (Thu), 07:59
I dont own a macro lens yet, but from all the reading I've done on this forum it appears to be the best choice for a decent amount of money. (Of course, if you can afford it, the MPE-65 that Canon makes is probably as good if not better)
Now, with the 100mm macro, you can always use Kenko extension tubes as well as the 250D closeup filter for a greater magnification.
gasrocks
31st of March 2005 (Thu), 08:02
But the 65 is hard to use and you don't really need that power. Start with some extension tubes first - you will use those anyway. Try them on the lenses you have. The 100 macro is really the way to go though. Using extension tubes, close-up lenses, tele-extenders and the 100 macro you can get all thepower I think you'll ever need.
D Boone
31st of March 2005 (Thu), 08:55
Will the close up lenses hurt the quality of the image? What brand to get? B&H didn't seem to have a huge selection?
sid
31st of March 2005 (Thu), 10:53
Will the close up lenses hurt the quality of the image? What brand to get? B&H didn't seem to have a huge selection?
The Canon ones shouldnt. I'd suggest getting the 250D or the 500D. (Canon also makes the 250 and 500). The 250D is intended for lenses from 50-135mm and the 500D for 75-300mm.
Here's an excellent review:
http://www.rogercavanagh.com/helpinfo/18_500d-1.stm
eosster
31st of March 2005 (Thu), 11:20
I would buy EF 100mm F/2.8 Macro, my next choice of lens.
vBulletin® v3.6.12, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.