View Full Version : 70-200/2.8L IS vs. 200/2.8L II
pcasciola
4th of April 2005 (Mon), 09:10
Has anyone seen (or done) a side by side comparison of the 70-200/2.8L IS and the 200/2.8L II prime? I just ordered the 70-200/2.8L IS, and I'm wondering if it would be worth having both.
Panza
4th of April 2005 (Mon), 11:48
I just got my 70-200 IS today and one reason I could possibly find for the 200 prime is the weight-advantage it has. But I think the zoom has excelent picture quality. But the weight is something...
roanjohn
4th of April 2005 (Mon), 14:31
Instead of getting both, why not get the 135 f2 L.......its not only faster, but also has the reputation as one of Canon's sharpest lens.........next to the 200 f1.8.
Ro1
vBulletin® v3.6.12, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.