Tamron made Kodak GEAR 80-210mm f/4.5-5.6

[kitacanon]

This lens is quite a surprise...
It is quite light through the light-weight kit type of construction, (using a lot of plastic in the construction, including the mount)
The mechanics and optics are very good...excellent if you consider that it is typically less than $50 on the market...I've seen NEW ones auctioned for less than $40...


Tamron also makes it in other mounts if you're also shooting, say Nikon...
The Tamron version uses a flat matte rubber grip on the zoom barrel, while the KodakGEAR version uses the more effective (IMHO)
ribbed rubber grip.
It comes with a useful bayonet mount lens hood that reverse locks on the lens for compact packing.

It does not have Image Stabilization, but it is an EF lens so it will fit and work on all EOS mounts, another feature...
A real benefit for the crop body is the elimination of full frame edges that might be softer than I have
experienced on my XT and 30D.

I have seen it listed as being made by Tiffen, but I don't think this is the case.

Here are the specifications:
Focal length 80 - 210mm Zoom ratio 2.6x
Digital equivalent Canon (1.6x crop) 128 - 336mm
Focus type automatic Zoom type One touch
Aperture type Automatic Aperture range F4.5/5.6-22
Lens construction 8 elements in 9 groups
Angle of view 30' - 12'
Minimum focus 4.9ft, 1.5m
Lens coating multi-coated
Macro reproduction 1:5.8
Filter size 52mm
Length 3.84in, 97.5mm
Diameter 2.8in, 71mm
Weight 9.9oz, 280g

http://img522.imageshack.us/img522/4025/kdk2.jpg[/FONT]

http://img522.imageshack.us/img522/6568/kdktl.jpg[/FONT]

Full frame shot on 30D, ISO 200, 210mm at F9 (1.3 stops down from wide open)...shot RAW with unsharpen mask 200/.2/0 in Photoshop6

http://img518.imageshack.us/img518/8062/catff88pu23.jpg

100% crop
http://img518.imageshack.us/img518/2559/catccu23.jpg

100% crop
http://img518.imageshack.us/img518/4466/catcru23.jpg

full frame 92mm@ F9
http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/6169/mg1886ff.jpg

Shot on my XT here it is, heavily cropped image. ...
http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/5143/mg1886c150pu13.jpg

full frame @ ISO 1600 80mm/7.1also on the XT
http://img410.imageshack.us/img410/1298/jr5sr.jpg

These are real situation shots, not taken for testing.
Stopped down an F-stop or two, I can recommend this lens as being as good as any for under $200...

[kitacanon]

Here are some birds...@ ISO 640...full frame and 100% crops...
these were taken with the 30D shot RAW and underwent USM 100/.3/0 to 200/.2/0

132mm F10 full frame
http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/6800/mg0448u13ff132f10.jpg
and 100% crop
http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/9283/mg0448cu22j.jpg

179mm F7.1 full frame
http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/4034/mg0446a17971u13ff.jpg
and 100% crop
http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/2928/mg0446a2c17971j.jpg

Again...I'm not saying it compares to a $500 or even a $300 lens...
...but if you're looking for a cheap startup tele-zoom this is would be a good choice...

[KenjiS]

That thing looks pretty damn sharp to me!

[Brett]

Not bad at all. Looks like something you'd find at a garage sale, but the images don't lie. :)

[kitacanon]

Not bad at all. Looks like something you'd find at a garage sale, but the images don't lie. :)

Pawnshop find actually...

[gabebalazs]

Wow, these images look awesome. What a find!

It's just like when I think I've known about most awesome guitarists then I find totally unknown guitar prodigies on Youtube again and again :)

[tkbslc]

I personally only think these look great in relation to the price. It certainly isn't any better than the new Sigma or Tamron zooms in the $150 range, which was about what it cost when new.

You can also get the same lens in a Tamron skin, but it is actually uglier.

[kitacanon]

I personally only think these look great in relation to the price. It certainly isn't any better than the new Sigma or Tamron zooms in the $150 range, which was about what it cost when new.

You can also get the same lens in a Tamron skin, but it is actually uglier.

I agree totally...about being a deal at the price...but that's the point...it's a $150 Tamron in cheaps clothing for a lot less...well, now it's ebaying in the $75 range...oh well....and yes, the Kodak is better looking than the Tammy...part of my agenda here is to give people confidence that quality depends on how you use gear, as much as it depends on the gear itself...I like pushing MF gear, but I've learned that many who have come to us from auto-PnS cams have no MF experience and can't relate...

On a trip I'm not the guy with pro looking gear... with busted looking cheapies, a scratched up XT, the IS kit, a Kodak tele and a busted filter rim 50/2 nikkor, I'm just the snapshooter trying to keep a low profile...once in India, a bunch of Euros got into it with me...and were very surprised to find out I was a yank...;)

[tkbslc]

I agree, it is a great buy, but it seems like some people were getting really excited like it was a sleeper L grade or something. I don't think anyone should go out of their way to find it, but if they stumble across one (or the Tamron version) than they know it is a decent buy.

Thanks for posting the review though, it seems like a lot of perfectly good lenses get overlooked. We need more reviews for the less mainstream lenses.

[fWord]

The results are surprisingly fine for the price. Looks like decent resolving power while contrast is slightly low. But wow, you must have had a lot of light for those shots, getting away with f/10 for the heron photo. When photographing wildlife I have to struggle with a wide open aperture even at ISO 1250 and above!

[kitacanon]

Loaned out my XT/Tamron-Kodak set on auto and told him to just shoot...came back with this JPEG shot...
ISO 400, 1/200@F6.3 @ 80mm, about 1 and a half F-stops down from wide open (4.5)...
full frame no USM
http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/7402/jnlzffsm.jpg

100% crop with 100/.3/0 USM in PS6
http://img115.imageshack.us/img115/1564/jnlzft.jpg

[tydougherty]

where the heck can one buy this lens?? it is exactly what I am looking for but nowhere to be found...

[kitacanon]

where the heck can one buy this lens?? it is exactly what I am looking for but nowhere to be found...

Search ebay with the words
Canon Kodak 80-210mm f4.5-5.6
or
Canon Tamron 80-210mm f4.5-5.6
or I've seen the Tamron listed as
Canon Kodak Tiffen 80-210mm f4.5-5.6 though the Tiffen label is an error...

The Tamron version is the same lens...it's just that the Kodak has a better rubber grip on the zoom barrel...

The going rate on Ebay is $40-75 delivered.


Here's a current auction as of 5/14...good luck:
http://cgi.ebay.com/Kodak-80-210mm-f-4-5-5-6-for-Canon-AF_W0QQitemZ110388904699QQcmdZViewItemQQptZCamera_ Lenses?hash=item19b3b102fb&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14&_trkparms=72%3A1205%7C66%3A2%7C65%3A12%7C39%3A1%7C 240%3A1318%7C301%3A1%7C293%3A1%7C294%3A50

[Neilyb]

I had the Tamron version of the lens and it was poor-really poor comapred to the canon 90-300 (and that thing sucked bad!)

[hk300]

i just bought one off ebay for gbp10. ... i hope it is worth the money.

[kitacanon]

i just bought one off ebay for gbp10. ... i hope it is worth the money.

Gbp = British pound?
$17US?
Maybe....

[ELSELS]

Hello,

I've got one of these lens and might be posting it up for sale....

I'm a (53 yr. old / young :)) - college student, almost Thanksgiving break, but been ill wrestling with severe sinus infection and flu to boot.

If I'm able to over the next few days, get a chance to get outside, to 'test drive' the lens more, I'll possibly have a few shots to post..

Doubt they'll be as 'sweet' as kitacanon's shots though...Great stuff!

Thanks for reading...

Happy Thanksgiving !

God Bless,
Ed


where the heck can one buy this lens?? it is exactly what I am looking for but nowhere to be found...

[fatdeeman]

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2798/4532777990_c9cfb9e1f5.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/fatdeeman/4532777990/)

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4014/4532749404_2d647150dd.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/fatdeeman/4532749404/)

[fatdeeman]

I have to say this lens is quite good, it's put together quite well thanks to it's tamron origins and mine came with a very nice custom lens bag complete with strap, can't fault the presentation! I got mine for around £15 on ebay.

The image quality is acceptable all throughout the aperture range apart from at the 210mm setting where it is not quite so good wide open but fine by about f/7.1. It could be better wide open at 210mm but it always seems to miss focus slightly which is frustrating but if you try a few times and get the focus right the sharpness at f/5.6 and 210mm is actually very respectable for something that can be had for so little. I didn't need this lens at all but after getting into using old MF lenses I have found using weird and wonderful lenses to be rewarding and more interesting than using the same lens all the time, I would say for the amount it cost I have more than made my money back from the enjoyment of using the lens, I appreciate some people see no point in owning anything but the best and I respect that but I like to mix it up and take a different lens out each time!

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2722/4535615669_b70e6e1a32.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/fatdeeman/4535615669/)

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2767/4535614495_0fe9c41c20.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/fatdeeman/4535614495/)

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2228/4536247474_161b8e7b14.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/fatdeeman/4536247474/)

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2696/4532853574_ef8eb32af9.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/fatdeeman/4532853574/)

[kitacanon]

Welcome aboard '-man'...
Outdoors, where longer lenses are typically used, it's really quite a nice "find"...nice color rendering you got there....
My experience was much like yours...stopping down a click or two increases depth of field for 'real-world' focusing sharpness as well as increasing the optical sharpness of the lens itself...a nice lightweight travel lens I think...Enjoy....

[fatdeeman]

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3483/4564324196_e631d1a539.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/fatdeeman/4564324196/)


http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3264/4564323942_f043ed21fe.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/fatdeeman/4564323942/)


http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4033/4544302351_2cfa04651a.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/fatdeeman/4544302351/)


http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2723/4538706200_8c0fa229bf.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/fatdeeman/4538706200/)

[MJF830]

I bought one from walmart with my Rebel X 35mm, and It is still works decent on my XTi

[cjm]

What did this lens cost new? And also at the pawnshop ;)

[kitacanon]

What did this lens cost new? And also at the pawnshop ;)

It can be gotten new on Ebay for about $50...probably the best tele-zoom for under $100

[fatdeeman]

It probably cost about the same new as the Tamron but on ebay second hand or "old new stock" it's much cheaper than the Tamron version so instantly a bargain.

I remember several years ago an advertiser in amateur photographer was selling them brand new for something like £70 and they were trying to heavily imply it was made by another famous company without actually being able to say it was Tamron. I was tempted even then but when I saw a practically unused one on ebay for so cheap there was really nothing to lose.

[TeamSpeed]

Here are some more samples...

My take on the lens is that even though the AF is noisy, it works well, and the images are really not all that bad wide-open. I was expecting much worse. This lens would work great as a frugal zoom lens, or for a starter's kit.

I received this lens brand-new, tested it out, was surprised by it, and now am selling it. :)

[TeamSpeed]

A couple more wide-open shots

[TeamSpeed]

Yes, a couple more, 80 vs 210 shots

[TeamSpeed]

Last 2, moon shot is a 100% crop as 210mm isn't very significant for such an attempt. :)

[TeamSpeed]

A few football shots from this lens (still selling it, but thought I would pull it out for a real event). :)

http://teamspeed.smugmug.com/CHSBand2011-2012/Carroll-Homecoming-2011/i-jTn42Bn/0/XL/BIG5684-XL.jpg
http://teamspeed.smugmug.com/CHSBand2011-2012/Carroll-Homecoming-2011/i-mCKmPZZ/0/XL/BIG5685-XL.jpg
http://teamspeed.smugmug.com/CHSBand2011-2012/Carroll-Homecoming-2011/i-bpkqv27/0/XL/BIG5689-XL.jpg
http://teamspeed.smugmug.com/CHSBand2011-2012/Carroll-Homecoming-2011/i-tvXqFZN/0/XL/BIG5688-XL.jpg

[Masis]

Took this lens to the zoo today and had some great results.

http://pcdn.500px.net/5708560/75d336e25e181497a683b8a1701374a7d5a20ee6/4.jpg

http://pcdn.500px.net/5676388/65e5cdb75e8c479a07c42a706656402a9bbc7b36/4.jpg

http://pcdn.500px.net/5680653/1c7fc9fa0dc4bf2b6306b8e0ac5cba794830c14b/4.jpg

[kitacanon]

Well done Masis!

I just discovered that this lens is also marketed under the Promaster label....just an FYI heads-up...