PDA

View Full Version : Crumpler 6MDH vs. LowePro MiniTrekker AW


Rainyday
21st of March 2009 (Sat), 18:37
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3577/3374196744_d6741682a4.jpg


Above is a pic of my LowePro MiniTrekker AW. Compared to the Crumpler, I beleive it offers superior weather proofing, more sophisticated storage of misc loose items and can be worn as a back pack or a sling. However, it is not as handsome as my bright red Crumpler and the Crumpler is far easier to use for quick access to lens and gear. I also find the Crumpler more ergonomic for me to carry. I am only 5' tall and ease of carry is critical for me.

Both currently hold the following easily: 18-55 kit lens, 70-200L, 480EX flash, 50mm prime, and misc items such as a small notebook, data cards, lens cleaner and so on.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3426/3350517058_45d026d5b1.jpg


Above is a picture of my husband carrying my Crumpler. He is 6' tall and handles it easily. I can too, but I'm lazy and like to have him tote it for me. :D

For a simple trip to the zoo in good weather, I'd pick the Crumpler. I'd also pick the Crumpler if I knew I would be changing lens frequently and rapidly. For a trip to a dusty rodeo, windy beach or stormy nature trek, definitely the LowePro. Oh, and you can carry the LowePro as either a sling or a backpack.

I like both bags. But they serve different purposes and I admit, the Crumpler, for it's fun color and zippy design, is my favorite.

SCOTTinNJ
21st of March 2009 (Sat), 18:46
70-200 fits in Crumpler? Surely you mean the f/4 because my f/2.8 doesn't fit all that well in my Crumpler 6 mil (and interestingly enough I've been considering the minitrekker for a few months).

Rainyday
21st of March 2009 (Sat), 18:51
70-200 fits in Crumpler? Surely you mean the f/4 because my f/2.8 doesn't fit all that well in my Crumpler 6 mil (and interestingly enough I've been considering the minitrekker for a few months).

Yes, I meant the f/4. I should have specified that, sorry.:o

Mchu86
21st of March 2009 (Sat), 22:25
70-200 fits in Crumpler? Surely you mean the f/4 because my f/2.8 doesn't fit all that well in my Crumpler 6 mil (and interestingly enough I've been considering the minitrekker for a few months).

My 70-200 f/2.8L fits pretty nicely into my 6MDH (hood reversed, not attached):
http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2002-6/28235/_L0V4527.jpg
http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2002-6/28235/_L0V4530.jpg

To the OP, I don't have a MiniTrekker, but I do have a Computrekker which I use along with my Crumpler. I can't agree more that the Crumpler is my go-to bag for quick storage/lens changes and for day trips. I'll usually use my Computrekker for transportation of gear or when I know it's a dedicated photo trip where I'll need chargers, etc (i.e. not just a trip into the city). They do both serve their own purposes. I like the backpacks for ease of caryy, but dislike them for easy access (or lack of). I like the sling for easy access, and not so much for comfort. Either way, they both do their different jobs...and do it nicely :)