View Full Version : Space Shuttle-upclose and personal
Eksath
28th of March 2009 (Sat), 20:26
To start the tread off, here are a few:
The captions have all the info:
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1504778/L/
http://www.airliners.net/photo/NASA/Rockwell-Space-Shuttle/1502566/L/ (http://www.airliners.net/photo/NASA/Rockwell-Space-Shuttle/1502566/L/)
http://www.airliners.net/photo/NASA/Rockwell-Space-Shuttle/1394537/L/ (http://www.airliners.net/photo/NASA/Rockwell-Space-Shuttle/1394537/L/)
PhotosGuy
29th of March 2009 (Sun), 08:26
Good ones.
chris78cpr
29th of March 2009 (Sun), 09:41
Nice shots Suresh.
Chris
Jon Foster
29th of March 2009 (Sun), 10:56
Wow. Those are awesome shots!
Jon.
NicolasRubio
29th of March 2009 (Sun), 11:44
Great as usual Suresh, glad to see you around here too!
WRCfan
29th of March 2009 (Sun), 16:00
Amazing pics. Would be a true treat to see a shuttle up this close!!
RogerAylstock
29th of March 2009 (Sun), 19:55
Suresh, you have the coolest shots!
BDM
29th of March 2009 (Sun), 20:45
That certainly is an impressive beast up close. it does look like it could use a paint job. Those are very nice pictures.
Bruce
Eksath
3rd of April 2009 (Fri), 18:55
THanks guys!
Nicholas, good to be here too with other Canon shooters!
Here is one more recent one
http://www.airliners.net/photo/NASA/Rockwell-Space-Shuttle/1507759/L/ (http://www.airliners.net/photo/NASA/Rockwell-Space-Shuttle/1507759/L/)
I promise to pull some more from my reference library and post stuff unpublished before here shortly!
12 Wyoming
3rd of April 2009 (Fri), 19:25
Wow! Good shot!
dlr328
5th of April 2009 (Sun), 21:44
I love this!! great work!! definitely subscribed...
muscleflex
6th of April 2009 (Mon), 10:15
nice shots! i so want to see it on its last launch in May!
i noticed your 2nd pic listed 1200 lens.... was that using a 2x? or you have the legendary 1200mm?
sma65
6th of April 2009 (Mon), 16:13
Very very nice shots.
Eksath
10th of April 2009 (Fri), 08:36
nice shots! i so want to see it on its last launch in May!
i noticed your 2nd pic listed 1200 lens.... was that using a 2x? or you have the legendary 1200mm?
Thanks!
I used a F/4 600mm lens with a 2X on it.
Eksath
8th of May 2009 (Fri), 19:08
One more...
http://www.airliners.net/photo/NASA/Rockwell-Space-Shuttle/1522333/L/
Eksath
12th of May 2009 (Tue), 21:04
Two pictures from STS 125 launch..with minimal edits. Heat haze was huge while she sat on pad and during her climb to the roll. The second shot is at start fo roll. Heat haze dropped off by hten.
Eksath
21st of June 2009 (Sun), 13:04
One more
http://www.airliners.net/photo/NASA/Rockwell-Space-Shuttle/1542905/L/
Aviation Junkie
21st of June 2009 (Sun), 14:00
Posting them as a.net approves them? Fantastic shots! The last one is a jaw dropper.
NicolasRubio
21st of June 2009 (Sun), 14:29
Nice shots Suresh!
I'll be there for the launch on February 4th, 2010... I hope you are there too so that you can show me around, LOL!
izthistaken
21st of June 2009 (Sun), 17:07
That one shot looks like it's made out of cardboard. :lol: Awesome man!
Eksath
27th of June 2009 (Sat), 19:45
A few more...
http://www.airliners.net/photo/NASA/Rockwell-Space-Shuttle/1546130/L/
and..
RadAL
27th of June 2009 (Sat), 21:00
Geez.. i am at a loss for words.
Eksath
28th of June 2009 (Sun), 13:17
Geez.. i am at a loss for words.
:cool:
THanks .. a few more
1.
http://www.airliners.net/photo/NASA/Rockwell-Space-Shuttle/1546295/L/
and 2 & 3:
Eksath
1st of July 2009 (Wed), 22:31
.
http://www.airliners.net/photo/NASA/Rockwell-Space-Shuttle/1547685/L/
and
.
m3pj
1st of July 2009 (Wed), 22:51
Great images, keep them coming!
Eksath
19th of September 2009 (Sat), 14:03
Great images, keep them coming!
http://www.airliners.net/photo/NASA/Rockwell-Space-Shuttle/1580444/L/ (http://www.airliners.net/photo/NASA/Rockwell-Space-Shuttle/1580444/L/)
More will follow.
canonloader
19th of September 2009 (Sat), 16:29
A great series of shots in this whole thread. I think our space shuttle program is the epitome of mans mechanical abilities, but I will be glad to see it go in favor of the next series of rides up.
Klippie
19th of September 2009 (Sat), 17:22
Amazing beautiful shots, here's a quick question how do the tyres not explode when the shuttle is in zero atmosphere...:?::?::?:
Radders
15th of October 2009 (Thu), 13:32
http://www.airliners.net/photo/NASA/Rockwell-Space-Shuttle/1580444/L/ (http://www.airliners.net/photo/NASA/Rockwell-Space-Shuttle/1580444/L/)
More will follow.
Your a lucky guy, I would love to come over and see this.
Fantastic photos:)
gkarris
15th of October 2009 (Thu), 14:56
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=376028&stc=1&d=1246149898
(gets intensely jealous..)
This one's my favorite.
Thanks so much for sharing these!
Eksath
3rd of November 2009 (Tue), 06:46
One more to the list.
Atlantis being dropped off on the pad for upcoming mission. (http://www.airliners.net/photo/NASA/Rockwell-Space-Shuttle/1604345/L/)
canonloader
3rd of November 2009 (Tue), 06:52
Did you happen to get any shots of "The Stick"?
Eksath
3rd of November 2009 (Tue), 09:33
Did you happen to get any shots of "The Stick"?
see here
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=773057
canonloader
3rd of November 2009 (Tue), 09:37
Ah, didn't see that. Great shot. I watched the launch on TV and it looked like it leaned over pretty far pretty fast, but apparently they know what they are doing. :)
I was wondering how they kept it vertical for the ride to the pad. Now I see the guy wires. :)
gkarris
3rd of November 2009 (Tue), 13:41
Did you happen to get any shots of "The Stick"?
see here
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=773057
Oh, is that what it's called?
It does look simply like they took a Shuttle Solid Rocket Booster and put an updated Apollo Capsule up top... :eek:
canonloader
3rd of November 2009 (Tue), 13:54
It does look simply like they took a Shuttle Solid Rocket Booster and put an updated Apollo Capsule up top
That's essentially what it is. The first stage is just a reworked shuttle booster. Tried and true.
Eksath
3rd of November 2009 (Tue), 15:17
Ah, didn't see that. Great shot. I watched the launch on TV and it looked like it leaned over pretty far pretty fast, but apparently they know what they are doing. :)
I was wondering how they kept it vertical for the ride to the pad. Now I see the guy wires. :)
The guide wire is for the lightning protection system on the pad. It has nothing to do with the Ares 1-x. the rocket is held in place by 4 bolts at the bottem. These 4 bolts are blown by explosives a few milleseconds before launch. The shuttle is held by 8 bolts.
gkarris
3rd of November 2009 (Tue), 15:20
That's essentially what it is. The first stage is just a reworked shuttle booster. Tried and true.
LOL... is it recoverable?
Well, I guess since "green" recycling is in... :D
canonloader
3rd of November 2009 (Tue), 17:14
The guide wire is for the lightning protection system on the pad. It has nothing to do with the Ares 1-x. the rocket is held in place by 4 bolts at the bottem. These 4 bolts are blown by explosives a few milleseconds before launch. The shuttle is held by 8 bolts.
Amazing. It must be a really smooth ride on that crawler then. :)
They explained the booster on TV. It's a reworked ****tel booster. Among other things, it was contoured to take extra air speed. I guess it reaches higher speeds, lower in the atmosphere.
Eksath
7th of November 2009 (Sat), 07:56
LOL... is it recoverable?
Well, I guess since "green" recycling is in... :D
Even on the Shuttle Transport System, the only "lost" component is the External Tank. The SRBs ditch in the Atlantic and recovered,refurbished and flown again. Ofcourse, the orbiter is re launched too.
In the Ares 1-x, the components in the first stage had all previously flown on numerous shuttle mission hence were recycled multiple times.
So there is more than just recycling by design specs here.
canonloader
7th of November 2009 (Sat), 09:51
I wondered why, if it's all recycleable, they kept harping on the cost of this test mission. The news people kept bring up how NASA and the government did not know if the they would go ahead with it cause of cost. How could it possibly cost more than the shuttle?
vBulletin® v3.6.12, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.