sugar_babygirli
11th of April 2005 (Mon), 07:35
So I know that the larger the aperture, the better you can shoot in low light, but also notice that the more you open it up, the less your depth of field is (which is why you'd use, say, f/22 for a landscape to have everything in focus)
So my question is, if I were to use f/1.8 to shoot a full body shot of a person about 30 feet away, would they be completely out of focus since the range is so far away? I notice the DOF is very shallow when using it to shoot very close objects, (such as a single flower) but does it still apply to full body shots far away?
See this full body photo: http://www.photosig.com/go/photos/view?id=1452190&forward=browse
And this face shot:
http://www.photosig.com/go/photos/view?id=1457096&forward=browse
Notice how they are both shot at the same aperture, but the on the first, all the body is in focus and the second, mainly the eyes? Is it because the closer you are to the subject, the more it tends to focus on only a small spot?
I have NO clue if this makes any sense! :rolleyes:
So my question is, if I were to use f/1.8 to shoot a full body shot of a person about 30 feet away, would they be completely out of focus since the range is so far away? I notice the DOF is very shallow when using it to shoot very close objects, (such as a single flower) but does it still apply to full body shots far away?
See this full body photo: http://www.photosig.com/go/photos/view?id=1452190&forward=browse
And this face shot:
http://www.photosig.com/go/photos/view?id=1457096&forward=browse
Notice how they are both shot at the same aperture, but the on the first, all the body is in focus and the second, mainly the eyes? Is it because the closer you are to the subject, the more it tends to focus on only a small spot?
I have NO clue if this makes any sense! :rolleyes: