Marshy
14th of April 2005 (Thu), 03:42
This is more of an observation than anything . Got my 1.4 con today
took 4 shots same subject same light etc with my 300D and 70-200f4 , first two with con got 1/100 and F5.6 iso200 at 280mm eval meter on first partial on second , partial meter shot was more under exposed , i expected this but without con on third shot got 1/160 and F.4 and fourth got 1/125 and F4 again 3rd shot eval metering and 4th partial but this time 4th shot was more over exposed , ? Shouldn,t exposures gone the same way on both my limited experience partial metering underexposes slightly which i prefer ?
took 4 shots same subject same light etc with my 300D and 70-200f4 , first two with con got 1/100 and F5.6 iso200 at 280mm eval meter on first partial on second , partial meter shot was more under exposed , i expected this but without con on third shot got 1/160 and F.4 and fourth got 1/125 and F4 again 3rd shot eval metering and 4th partial but this time 4th shot was more over exposed , ? Shouldn,t exposures gone the same way on both my limited experience partial metering underexposes slightly which i prefer ?