Visu3
22nd of April 2009 (Wed), 12:24
I'm a freelance programmer type, and one of my projects over the past year has been an application for photographers to (easily) make web pages to display work and such. It's currently in the prototype stage, and not too much work is left until a possible launch. So, I'd like to hear from photographers - is there interest in such an animal? Here's the premise:
Everything's Flash-based - the site itself (one HTML page with a Flash site, but indexed for search engine visibility), and the control panel, accessible after logging in. From the control panel, you can use drag-and-drop interfaces to upload photos (in any format), arrange them into galleries, and arrange the galleries on the site. Features to implement include "info pages" to complement the galleries and make the Flash page a full easily-manageable and good-looking portfolio/contact page. If I launch the app (tentatively named Visual Cascade), new features will be implemented based on user demand.
The app would be free at first, and if it proved useful and popular as testing concluded, the most likely cost structure would be a free Lite version and a cheap monthly-fee based full version. (Hosting included for everything)
How does this sound? If I go through with launching an alpha test, does this sound like a useful application?
Thanks for the input.
Everything's Flash-based - the site itself (one HTML page with a Flash site, but indexed for search engine visibility), and the control panel, accessible after logging in. From the control panel, you can use drag-and-drop interfaces to upload photos (in any format), arrange them into galleries, and arrange the galleries on the site. Features to implement include "info pages" to complement the galleries and make the Flash page a full easily-manageable and good-looking portfolio/contact page. If I launch the app (tentatively named Visual Cascade), new features will be implemented based on user demand.
The app would be free at first, and if it proved useful and popular as testing concluded, the most likely cost structure would be a free Lite version and a cheap monthly-fee based full version. (Hosting included for everything)
How does this sound? If I go through with launching an alpha test, does this sound like a useful application?
Thanks for the input.