Bethel
22nd of April 2009 (Wed), 19:55
I'm in the planning stages of my final undergrad project for a BA in psych. I have decided on a project that will involve elderly folks. I plan to use basic photography in an art therapy program.
So I am wondering if folks here may have some advice on disposable cameras vs extremely cheap digital cameras.
The disposable cameras would be easiest, and cheapest up-front, but then the time and expense involved in developing becomes a drawback.
Cheap digital cameras - if they are cheap enough - will cut out the expense of the developing, and the time, but they'll have the disadvantages perhaps of being unreliable, hard to use (especially for older folks) and may well produce photos that make Lomo look good.
And so I come here looking for advice.
What do you folks think? If I use digital I think I'll need about 20 to 30 cameras to make this project work, but I might be able to get by with fewer.
So I am wondering if folks here may have some advice on disposable cameras vs extremely cheap digital cameras.
The disposable cameras would be easiest, and cheapest up-front, but then the time and expense involved in developing becomes a drawback.
Cheap digital cameras - if they are cheap enough - will cut out the expense of the developing, and the time, but they'll have the disadvantages perhaps of being unreliable, hard to use (especially for older folks) and may well produce photos that make Lomo look good.
And so I come here looking for advice.
What do you folks think? If I use digital I think I'll need about 20 to 30 cameras to make this project work, but I might be able to get by with fewer.