Goofup
17th of April 2005 (Sun), 19:15
Background:
I have PE3, Shipley's masks, curves, etc., the Neat Image plugin to handle PE3's limited noise reduction, and Focus Magic. I'm not completely new to this: PE2 & 3, PSP 7,8, & 9, PhotoImpact10. I'm not a pro, do a bit of RAW, mostly HQ jpegs off my 300D, don't need CMYK, etc. There's no way I'm going to spend $650 on Photoshop.
However, Adobe has a Canon/PE2 offer going where next month I can get the full boxed CS2 for $299. This is tempting... maybe.
SO, I'm looking for advice. Frankly I'm not going to use CS2 for much more than what my PE3 is capable of. My question is: is CS2 gonna do the same things any better than PE3 (or PSP9 for that matter) to justify the $300 cost (and months to learn)???
Now I know I could get the trial of CS and see for myself, and the ultimate decision is mine, but I'm just looking for opinions from those who have/have use both. Is CS that much "better" than PE3??
I have PE3, Shipley's masks, curves, etc., the Neat Image plugin to handle PE3's limited noise reduction, and Focus Magic. I'm not completely new to this: PE2 & 3, PSP 7,8, & 9, PhotoImpact10. I'm not a pro, do a bit of RAW, mostly HQ jpegs off my 300D, don't need CMYK, etc. There's no way I'm going to spend $650 on Photoshop.
However, Adobe has a Canon/PE2 offer going where next month I can get the full boxed CS2 for $299. This is tempting... maybe.
SO, I'm looking for advice. Frankly I'm not going to use CS2 for much more than what my PE3 is capable of. My question is: is CS2 gonna do the same things any better than PE3 (or PSP9 for that matter) to justify the $300 cost (and months to learn)???
Now I know I could get the trial of CS and see for myself, and the ultimate decision is mine, but I'm just looking for opinions from those who have/have use both. Is CS that much "better" than PE3??