View Full Version : The Eye of God
A.S.I.G.N. Observatory
2nd of May 2009 (Sat), 03:43
While shooting the Lagoon all night last night, there came a point where I was faced with an azimuth flip, which I am hesitant to do:whistle:....
So, while considering packing up and heading in, I had a flick through the tour function and lo and behold...what's this? The Helix Nebula? Leftover shell of a long gone stellar explosion.
Well, I had almost forgotten about this beauty so I thought I wpould have a go as it was still only four in the morning and there was still some dark left.
There was a bit of dew in the sky by then and I only got a few 10 minute subs. I had to reject a few because the moisture in the air was bouncing orange street light sky glow around like crazy.
I had to stretch the heck out of it but hey, do what you can huh?
I can't wait to do this again in about a month and do it properly!
Baz.
Black Diamond ED120APO, Orion Starshoot Pro DSI OS CCD camera.
Karl Johnston
2nd of May 2009 (Sat), 03:59
Hey wow :D I've seen pictures of this ...wooow
Desertraptor
2nd of May 2009 (Sat), 04:53
Wow
Celestron
2nd of May 2009 (Sat), 14:22
Very ,very nice Baz ! I would like to see you add more to this one cause this one is very seldom imaged and posted anywhere !
Naturalist
2nd of May 2009 (Sat), 14:25
Very nice image. You must have a heck of a scope!
A.S.I.G.N. Observatory
2nd of May 2009 (Sat), 18:53
Thanks guys! Doug, the scope is only a 120mm refractor F/7.5
Does the job though.
Baz.
dispatchermike21
4th of May 2009 (Mon), 14:28
Amazing. can't wait to see the next one.
Nighthound
4th of May 2009 (Mon), 16:36
Great work Baz. The color looks dead on and you're getting some nice interior detail.
Looking forward to your encore.
cruiser
4th of May 2009 (Mon), 19:01
Great shot Baz,
Its great when something you that you hadn't even planned turns out to be so good.
Lovely colours too.
Brett
chris.bailey
5th of May 2009 (Tue), 02:12
Very nice capture and I dont think it is spoiled by the level of stretching. Is that cropped, if not that scope has great flatness out to the edges.
Jim G
5th of May 2009 (Tue), 02:24
Fascinating!
Adrena1in
5th of May 2009 (Tue), 07:46
Is that cropped, if not that scope has great flatness out to the edges.
I'm assuming that must be cropped...I'm sure the Helix wouldn't appear that big through a 900mm scope. If it does though I'm definitely going to have to give it a go.
Lovely image, I really like the Helix Nebula, and the Ring, which is similar.
chris.bailey
5th of May 2009 (Tue), 09:06
I'm assuming that must be cropped...I'm sure the Helix wouldn't appear that big through a 900mm scope.
that was my first thought too but no signs of obvious pixellation if heavily cropped from a Starshoot CCD.
jbrown7815
5th of May 2009 (Tue), 09:09
Hey Baz :D
I can actually see your pics here.
Pretty awesome
videochicke
5th of May 2009 (Tue), 11:37
Great shot!!!
A.S.I.G.N. Observatory
5th of May 2009 (Tue), 19:43
Thanks heaps everyone!!
I only cropped off the edges where the stacking program left edges. There was a slight amount of elongated stars near the corners, but the flatness of this scope is excellent in general.
davidd10
15th of May 2009 (Fri), 08:22
That is really nice!
RandyMN
15th of May 2009 (Fri), 08:28
Nice shot but it brings up a question about astr-photography.
Is it true that to take photo's of atronomy objects the camera needs to track a moving object to actually get the exposure correct?
The object is actually moving enough during exposure to only get a sharp subject by having the lens move with it?
A.S.I.G.N. Observatory
16th of May 2009 (Sat), 08:49
Nice shot but it brings up a question about astr-photography.
Is it true that to take photo's of atronomy objects the camera needs to track a moving object to actually get the exposure correct?
The object is actually moving enough during exposure to only get a sharp subject by having the lens move with it?
That's right Randy. My telescope and camera is mounted to an EQ6 PRO German Equatorial Mount. Sidereal timed worm drives follow the stars and track through the night, while a parallel telescope uses an auto-guide camera to send any periodic error corrections directly to the motor drives in the mount.
Baz.
Peerie
16th of May 2009 (Sat), 10:02
Baz,
You don't have IMAGE EDITING OK, therefore I can't post the image I have edited.
Do you want me to post it?
John
Peerie
16th of May 2009 (Sat), 10:06
Randy,
The dark sky object isn't moving. We are moving.
John
A.S.I.G.N. Observatory
18th of May 2009 (Mon), 05:47
Baz,
You don't have IMAGE EDITING OK, therefore I can't post the image I have edited.
Do you want me to post it?
JohnGo for it John. I'm out in the observatory tonight shooting the Trifid Nebula so I may not answer for a few hours.
I will be re-doing the Eye of God at the end of the week for a few nights, to get a LOT more subs.
Peerie
19th of May 2009 (Tue), 11:48
Baz,
Have had play with the image. Will help with other data added to it.
You obviously have good skies.
John
A.S.I.G.N. Observatory
19th of May 2009 (Tue), 18:02
Nice John. Colours are a bit rich and painted though. You are correct though. More data hopefully this weekend being a new moon.
Baz.
Celestron
19th of May 2009 (Tue), 23:40
Here is what is better know as The Eye of God (Helix Neb) . Some do red but the most popular color is like this one from the eso.org gallery .
http://www.eso.org/gallery/d/83184-1/phot-07a-09.jpg
InverseX
20th of May 2009 (Wed), 08:12
Crazy! Well done.
vBulletin® v3.6.12, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.