[Hyuni]
12th of May 2009 (Tue), 09:25
I'm going to Japan on Saturday for one week to meet up my old grad school roomate and tour the country.
Somethings I plan to do there:
Go to many famous landmarks,
Sumo match <-- awesome
eat at famous ramen, udon, and donkatsu restaurants,
go to a club
take photos of mount fuji
go to the ocean
I plan to do a LOT of walking, so traveling light is essential. I'm brining a small carry-on with only a few shirts, 2 jeans, a pair of shorts, clubwear, and underwear. I'd also like to bring as few photog equipment (gasp!) as possible.
Up until a week ago (before I bought the 1DmkII), I planned to bring my crumpler 5MDH with my 40D and Tamron 17-50 attached with the Sigma 50 1.4. That way I could get a lot of wide angle touristy shots of all the famous landmarks, and use the sigma for lowlight, indoor, and night photography (which I plan to do a lot of).
AFTER I bought my 1DmkII, I'm debating whether or not I should bring that instead. Unfortunately, the Tammy vignettes severely on it because it wasn't meant for 1.3x crop bodies, so I have no wide angle. So if I bring my 1DmkII, the only thing I could fit in my crumpler is the body and sigma (maybe a flash (but I probably won't need it)
I'm still leaning towards the 40D combo, but there's a strong urge that's telling me I should use my new baby...
Pros of bringing 40D:
ability to use wide angle lens
lighter and smaller than 1DmkII
I am better with the controls (fairly new to 1DmkII)
Pros of bringing 1DmkII:
better IQ and more features
better noise handling (I think)
1.3x crop
Stronger body/weather sealed
Less accusations on 40D (planning to sell it right after I come back from Japan)
spending quality time with my new toy :)
Or stuff everything my my SS200AW and use both? probably not...
Also, among my three lenses, which two would you bring and why?
I need a tad bit more insight to decide. Thanks in advance!
Somethings I plan to do there:
Go to many famous landmarks,
Sumo match <-- awesome
eat at famous ramen, udon, and donkatsu restaurants,
go to a club
take photos of mount fuji
go to the ocean
I plan to do a LOT of walking, so traveling light is essential. I'm brining a small carry-on with only a few shirts, 2 jeans, a pair of shorts, clubwear, and underwear. I'd also like to bring as few photog equipment (gasp!) as possible.
Up until a week ago (before I bought the 1DmkII), I planned to bring my crumpler 5MDH with my 40D and Tamron 17-50 attached with the Sigma 50 1.4. That way I could get a lot of wide angle touristy shots of all the famous landmarks, and use the sigma for lowlight, indoor, and night photography (which I plan to do a lot of).
AFTER I bought my 1DmkII, I'm debating whether or not I should bring that instead. Unfortunately, the Tammy vignettes severely on it because it wasn't meant for 1.3x crop bodies, so I have no wide angle. So if I bring my 1DmkII, the only thing I could fit in my crumpler is the body and sigma (maybe a flash (but I probably won't need it)
I'm still leaning towards the 40D combo, but there's a strong urge that's telling me I should use my new baby...
Pros of bringing 40D:
ability to use wide angle lens
lighter and smaller than 1DmkII
I am better with the controls (fairly new to 1DmkII)
Pros of bringing 1DmkII:
better IQ and more features
better noise handling (I think)
1.3x crop
Stronger body/weather sealed
Less accusations on 40D (planning to sell it right after I come back from Japan)
spending quality time with my new toy :)
Or stuff everything my my SS200AW and use both? probably not...
Also, among my three lenses, which two would you bring and why?
I need a tad bit more insight to decide. Thanks in advance!