PDA

View Full Version : Please c&c - feel free to re-edit :)


DYORD
16th of May 2009 (Sat), 01:43
http://i283.photobucket.com/albums/kk291/DYORD/Photography/snow_running1of1.jpg

tonydee
16th of May 2009 (Sat), 01:59
Rather than coming across as a dynamic action shot, this strikes me more as a taxidermist's effort to return her latest project to a natural setting, but perhaps the glue's not working so well on the grass.... I don't take drugs, honest. Maybe that's the problem.

Applying the rule of thirds horizontally, and guideline to have subject's facing into frame, with a splash of rotation...

365434

Not sure why, but somehow this works better for me. Perhaps being stuck in the centre of the scene was part of what made the original seem static?

Cheers, Tony

gcflora
16th of May 2009 (Sat), 02:46
Not sure why, but somehow this works better for me. Perhaps being stuck in the centre of the scene was part of what made the original seem static?

Cheers, Tony

I'd like to learn more about "static"; it's a term I've heard used before... what is static, and what makes a photo static?

Regards, Craig

tonydee
16th of May 2009 (Sat), 02:56
"Static", in this context, means things look like they're not moving. I know that might seem a strange thing to say about your initial shot, but for me it really did look more like a stuffed dog falling over, rather than a dog racing forwards. The issue must result from the interplay of being so front on to the dog, the angle of incline, shutter speed (too fast to show any suggestive motion blur), exposure issues related to the extreme contrast between the sunlit dog and shadow areas, and the original framing. The crop I've suggested also helps because the dog is closer to left, which creates a tension on that side, whereas the open space on the right is presented as a destination into which the movement can happen.

Cheers, Tony

gcflora
16th of May 2009 (Sat), 03:42
"Static", in this context, means things look like they're not moving. I know that might seem a strange thing to say about your initial shot

Well, it isn't my shot, but thanks: you give a great description of what static means. I will endeavour to keep your points in mind when taking photos. Thanks Tony.

Cheers, Craig

Flo
16th of May 2009 (Sat), 10:47
Rather than coming across as a dynamic action shot, this strikes me more as a taxidermist's effort to return her latest project to a natural setting, but perhaps the glue's not working so well on the grass.... I don't take drugs, honest. Maybe that's the problem.

Applying the rule of thirds horizontally, and guideline to have subject's facing into frame, with a splash of rotation...


Not sure why, but somehow this works better for me. Perhaps being stuck in the centre of the scene was part of what made the original seem static?

Cheers, Tony
Tony, my coffee is covering my keyboard:p

DerekSimon
16th of May 2009 (Sat), 14:33
Rather than coming across as a dynamic action shot, this strikes me more as a taxidermist's effort to return her latest project to a natural setting, but perhaps the glue's not working so well on the grass.... I don't take drugs, honest. Maybe that's the problem.



Now that comment there made my day!

Sisyphus
16th of May 2009 (Sat), 15:00
...a taxidermist's effort to return her latest project to a natural setting....

You got me with that one, too. And now I have coffee stains down the front of my shirt. :)

MikePrattPhotography
16th of May 2009 (Sat), 15:45
i love the action shot! great capture.

KoolaGirl
16th of May 2009 (Sat), 19:13
cute dog!

Desertraptor
16th of May 2009 (Sat), 19:29
Yes nice looking dog. But it's only a backyard snap?
Personally I wouldn't post it. What really can be done to enhance this shot?
Sorry but that's me and possibly the harshest comment I ever made here.

chrisu002
17th of May 2009 (Sun), 07:53
backyard too dark dog overexposed
picture seem to have a tilt to it