View Full Version : PRE BORN
mercersmoments
23rd of May 2009 (Sat), 04:08
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3596/3417572006_0a88c28e4f_b.jpg
txsnurse
24th of May 2009 (Sun), 07:22
Love the pic, but the sono pic doesn't make sense to me. It's not a typical facial shot - is there meaning in it?
asysin2leads
7th of June 2009 (Sun), 21:49
Love the pic, but the sono pic doesn't make sense to me. It's not a typical facial shot - is there meaning in it?
It's the baby's head to the right of the image and the torso to the left of the head.
OP, I'd clone out the stretch marks.
christyjo2
8th of June 2009 (Mon), 00:01
i agree with the stretch marks (unless the mother wants them left in. (however as a mom of 4, i personally would want mine cloned out). and txsnurse, i would usually assume that the meaning of the sonogram regardless of what part of the body it is, would be that this is what her belly looked like at the time of the sonogram. That way she can remember how big the baby was in utero at the time BUT...it looks as though the baby in the sonogram is much smaller in gestation than how far along she is. I would try using a sonogram that is matched for dates.
Kauaicrazed
8th of June 2009 (Mon), 00:54
I'd also want the stretch marks cloned out if it were my belly.
Stealthy Ninja
8th of June 2009 (Mon), 01:07
I'd have used a deeper or shallower DOF for this shot. As it is, the belly looks a bit carelessly OOF.
iadubber
8th of June 2009 (Mon), 09:47
I'd have used a deeper or shallower DOF for this shot. As it is, the belly looks a bit carelessly OOF.
I totally agree. I just don't think anything in this shot does it for me. Sorry.
vBulletin® v3.6.12, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.