PDA

View Full Version : Camera for Macro


LamontSanders
25th of May 2009 (Mon), 19:59
Is there a "best" camera for shooting macro? I am thinking the 5D Mk II is the best equipped, but would something like a 1DS Mk II be better with its autofocus? Kind of a weird question, any DSLR does the trick, but some are probably better suited than others. Thanks!

Gnomey
25th of May 2009 (Mon), 21:08
Autofocus isn't really used in macro, usually focus is achieved by moving the camera backwards and forwards and not touching the focus ring at all. The MPE doesn't even have autofocus. The larger viewfinder size in the fullframe cameras will help with manual focusing.

If you are going to be taking photos of insects then size and weight may be of concern as this is done mostly without tripod, so the 5D might be preferable.

Your 400D will be fine for macro, I see that you have sold your 60mm macro so I guess you are upgrading to fullframe. If you are choosing between the 1DS MKII and the 5D MKII, I personally would go for the 5D MKII due to the smaller size. The video capabilities of the 5D would also be fun to play with, Liewwk has done some good macro videos.

Naturalist
25th of May 2009 (Mon), 21:14
Autofocus isn't really used in macro, usually focus is achieved by moving the camera backwards and forwards

So true! When I'm shooting wildflower macros I'm lying flat on the ground and focusing with my toes!

As to the OP's point regarding best camera for macro, all cameras are good so long as you have a dedicated macro lens. You can shoot with macro filters and extension tubes, of course, but superior image quality will be achieved using one of the dedicated macro lenses and, just because the lens states "macro" on the barrel, does not mean you will achieve a true 1:1 or greater ratio.

LamontSanders
25th of May 2009 (Mon), 21:53
I guess I should have clarified one thing and used my common sense for another.

Yes I am planning on moving to full frame, probably the 5D II. I never even thought about macro video, good call! I really do like my 400D/XTi and I may keep it as a backup. As far as AF goes, I should have thought before I spoke (well, misspoke). I usually AF to the subject then MF to "perfection". I think the 1DS Mk II is just a beautiful camera, and weight doesn't bother me, but I feel like the 5D Mark II is the smarter investment for many reasons. Thanks for the input. I am sure I will have more questions before I make my purchase.

Gnomey
25th of May 2009 (Mon), 22:21
Also remember that changing focus using AF or the focus ring changes the magnification of the subject. So if you want to get the highest magnification possible you will need to set the lens to the closest focus distance and focus by moving back and forth.

John_B
26th of May 2009 (Tue), 06:56
LamontSanders,
If you make the move to FF you will notice the macro magnification seems to drop. The lens still gives 1:1 but the 5DmkII sensor is bigger so the result is less magnification. You will also see the same change when using telephoto lenses.

Ex. In the Macro Variations <-- click to see (http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=578274) I show a photo taken of a $$ one with the 5D and 100mm f/2.8 at 1:1 the other with the 10D and 100mm f/2.8 at 1:1

LamontSanders
26th of May 2009 (Tue), 11:16
John,

I figured something like that would happen. That link was very informative, thanks for the heads up.