View Full Version : fotki prints?
hornetzoo
26th of April 2005 (Tue), 14:24
Has anyone tried ordering prints from them? How was the quality?
markubig
26th of April 2005 (Tue), 15:54
Has anyone tried ordering prints from them? How was the quality?
I have . . . they're not that great IMO. For some reason, skin tones come out with a reddish tint to them and colors, in general, were a little dull. The only positive I saw from them is that they were the least expensive, but in this case, it was "You get what you pay for." This was a year or so ago, so maybe they improved if you want to try them out.
Personally, I use www.kodakgallery.com (http://www.kodakgallery.com) (formerly ofoto.com). They use Kodak processing and printing and the pictures come out great with excellent color and quality.
I've also heard good things about www.snapfish.com (http://www.snapfish.com)
Good luck!
hornetzoo
26th of April 2005 (Tue), 16:03
thanks, and can anyone compare online photo printing vs. actually going to a shop?
carol baker
11th of December 2005 (Sun), 20:03
I have been using Fotki for 8 years now, and I really like them. Fotki just introduced new lower prices on all formats, 4" by 6" is now 9 cents.
Photo Works and Shutterfly - 19¢ per print
Yahoo! Photos and Kodak Gallery - 15¢ per print
Snapfish and Sony Imagestation - 12¢ per printAs far as in-store printing, I know Walmart charges 19 cents a print while-you-wait and 15 cents on the orders you have to come pick up. I think I am not mistaken.
Radtech1
11th of December 2005 (Sun), 20:31
I have been using Fotki for 8 years now, and I really like them. Fotki just introduced new lower prices on all formats, 4" by 6" is now 9 cents.
Carol,
Is it ink-jet or chemical printing?
Rad
carol baker
15th of December 2005 (Thu), 11:00
This is what Fotki.com state:
We print on Fujicolor Crystal Archive professional photographic paper, processed through Fuji Hunt Chemicals. The archival quality of this process is 50+ years before fading may occur. This is the same process used at the best pro-labs.
So I assume this is chemical.
:D
jfrancho
16th of December 2005 (Fri), 14:11
I've had good luck with Mpix, WHCC, Shutterfly, and EZPrint. The only time I got really bad prints was when I sent the images with the wrong profile - my mistake.
markubig
17th of December 2005 (Sat), 00:20
I've had good luck with Mpix, WHCC, Shutterfly, and EZPrint. The only time I got really bad prints was when I sent the images with the wrong profile - my mistake. what colorspace are you supposed to send in to get good colored prints?
jfrancho
17th of December 2005 (Sat), 09:31
what colorspace are you supposed to send in to get good colored prints?Well, it depends on the printer. I sent images tageed with aRGB profiles to EZPrint, and they accept sRGB. I forgot to convert to sRGB for some reason. Saturated blues and greens were way off, skin tones were a little flat; basically they were unusable. Each of the services should tell what to use, if they don't, I guess I'd assume sRGB, though I probably wouldn't use them if they didn't know.
vBulletin® v3.6.12, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.