PDA

View Full Version : Bought a Sigma 10-22 just for New York, here are some


jimmyb_2
31st of May 2009 (Sun), 14:32
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v395/jimmyb2/IMG_4851.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v395/jimmyb2/IMG_4323.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v395/jimmyb2/IMG_4691.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v395/jimmyb2/IMG_4352.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v395/jimmyb2/Taxis.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v395/jimmyb2/IMG_4840.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v395/jimmyb2/IMG_4461.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v395/jimmyb2/Fountain.jpg

jimmyb_2
1st of June 2009 (Mon), 19:56
Bueller, bueller... anyone??? bueller.

TheBurningCrown
1st of June 2009 (Mon), 20:08
Did it work? Anyone? Anyone know the effects? It did not work, and the United States sank deeper into the Great Depression.

infinite012
1st of June 2009 (Mon), 20:14
They all look slightly out of focus, or blurry, or something wrong.

What were you looking for? C&C?

Tom Foolery's Dad
1st of June 2009 (Mon), 22:45
Is this straight out of the camera? I was thinking about getting a 10-20 lens before I go back east in October for some of these wide-angle shots.

They do look a bit distorted but I can't tell if that's because of the lens or any processing you've done to them.

emomophantom
2nd of June 2009 (Tue), 12:31
Hey I like them. I think some (additional?) PP could help some, but I like the framing. That's my favorite lens. I use it as my walk-around lens.

jimmyb_2
2nd of June 2009 (Tue), 16:45
They are all straight out of the camera with a little contrast/ saturation added. I was just looking for feedback, good or bad, to learn from. Guess i should have said so at the start of the post. I'm just trying to make a career change to photography so i was just wondering what people thought of some of my pics.

mikekelley
2nd of June 2009 (Tue), 17:18
Looks like you'd benefit greatly from a CPL.

Tom Foolery's Dad
2nd of June 2009 (Tue), 23:08
I really do like your compositions in these pictures!

infinite012
3rd of June 2009 (Wed), 04:25
They are all straight out of the camera with a little contrast/ saturation added. I was just looking for feedback, good or bad, to learn from. Guess i should have said so at the start of the post. I'm just trying to make a career change to photography so i was just wondering what people thought of some of my pics.
Try to sharpen them up a bit. It might help.

jimmyb_2
3rd of June 2009 (Wed), 11:36
Do you think the blurry part of the image is from where i am focusing (center focus), the lens, or the aperture. Or all of the above. Should i focus on the closest part of the image so that is sharp and fades as it gets further from that point. I know i need to use the aperture more, i mainly leave that open (outside i would adjust a little to around f 11) and use the shutter to get the exposure i want.

emomophantom
3rd of June 2009 (Wed), 14:34
Do you think the blurry part of the image is from where i am focusing (center focus), the lens, or the aperture. Or all of the above. Should i focus on the closest part of the image so that is sharp and fades as it gets further from that point. I know i need to use the aperture more, i mainly leave that open (outside i would adjust a little to around f 11) and use the shutter to get the exposure i want.

Depends on the shot, of course, but most of your pictures here are landscape-ish (buildings, streets, etc.), and a good rule of thumb would be to stop down to f8 or more. Then you run the risk of blur from too low shutter speeds (usually something slower than 1/60). Picture #3, however, would benefit from a shallower depth of field, so wide aperture works.

I can tell you, though, that this is not my sharpest lens, especially around the edges. And yes, some post-sharpening would help. I re-set my focal points while I'm shooting, but my girlfriend hates that and just leaves all the focal points on.

nicksan
3rd of June 2009 (Wed), 15:51
No reason to be stopping down that much on these shots.

That said, I like the last shot the best.