CoolToolGuy
30th of April 2005 (Sat), 17:14
I have the Canon FD-EOS converter and I got a used FD 400 f4.5 SSC lens from KEH to use with it. The compatibility chart shows this lens as compatible, but it also has a note that certain of these lenses will not be compatible. I think I found out why.
The copy that I got is a bayonet FD mount, and in the rear of the lens, near the mount, is a rectangular mask like an internal hood. The FD-EOS converter is much like a Canon EOS teleconverter, with an element that extends into the back of the lens. The mask prevents the converter from being mounted. The later versions of this lens have a mask that accommodates the converter.
I have looked at the mask and it appears that I could 'hog out' the metal to clear the converter. It seems to have no mechanical functions, and since the converter extends further into the lens it would not serve any optical purpose. I could probably remove it altogether, although I have not taken it apart as of yet.
Has anyone dealt with this? A modified mask would technically decrease its value as an FD lens, but it increases its value for use on a DSLR.
I don't think I can return the lens to KEH, even though they have a bayonet version that should have the later mask and I would be willing to trade up.
Any insight or references to this issue would be greatly appreciated.
Have Fun,
The copy that I got is a bayonet FD mount, and in the rear of the lens, near the mount, is a rectangular mask like an internal hood. The FD-EOS converter is much like a Canon EOS teleconverter, with an element that extends into the back of the lens. The mask prevents the converter from being mounted. The later versions of this lens have a mask that accommodates the converter.
I have looked at the mask and it appears that I could 'hog out' the metal to clear the converter. It seems to have no mechanical functions, and since the converter extends further into the lens it would not serve any optical purpose. I could probably remove it altogether, although I have not taken it apart as of yet.
Has anyone dealt with this? A modified mask would technically decrease its value as an FD lens, but it increases its value for use on a DSLR.
I don't think I can return the lens to KEH, even though they have a bayonet version that should have the later mask and I would be willing to trade up.
Any insight or references to this issue would be greatly appreciated.
Have Fun,