PDA

View Full Version : Fill flash

Matt30D
20th of June 2009 (Sat), 08:38
Fill Flash
HybridUK
20th of June 2009 (Sat), 09:25
What about it? lol
egordon99
20th of June 2009 (Sat), 20:16
Here is a good discussion of the topic -
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=643904
JWright
21st of June 2009 (Sun), 17:30
Fill Flash

???
bps
21st of June 2009 (Sun), 18:27
Fill Flash

Do you want us to search for you?
Mike
22nd of June 2009 (Mon), 09:50
Fill Flash

An interesting and well put together question/statement...:rolleyes:
Robert16
22nd of June 2009 (Mon), 12:57
Yep. Fill flash indeed.


:confused:
tdodd
23rd of June 2009 (Tue), 04:41
Excellent thread. Should we make it a sticky?
Mike
23rd of June 2009 (Tue), 05:22
Manual focus


I thought I'd continue in the OP's original style :P
Robert16
23rd of June 2009 (Tue), 09:44
I'll play too. Ahem . . . here goes. . .

Exposure bracketing
HMetal
23rd of June 2009 (Tue), 18:37
Where's the glass and who am I flashing?

Geez, I feel like a drunk pervert now. LOL
Amorous
27th of June 2009 (Sat), 02:40
May be he was drunk when he was typing, then fell asleep after typing two words. :lol:
canonnoob
27th of June 2009 (Sat), 02:44
ah i see what he is talking about!
Tiberius47
27th of June 2009 (Sat), 07:06
Yes, Phil Flash is a friend of mine. A jolly nice chap...
bnlearle
28th of June 2009 (Sun), 14:26
Manual focus
bw! :lol:

Seriously, this stopped me in my seat. I laughed so hard :)
tester3000
1st of July 2009 (Wed), 22:16
Fill flash is indeed the way to go :)
Christopher Steven b
2nd of July 2009 (Thu), 21:23
Fill Flash

36.
PaulaSmith
16th of October 2009 (Fri), 20:37
Snicker, Snort.........Sure, I am new to this site. But this made me laugh out loud............ What happened to the rest of his question???? LOL
katodog
16th of October 2009 (Fri), 20:38
36.


No, the answer is 42
Nate P.
16th of October 2009 (Fri), 20:47
Fill Flash
Absolutely!
dital
23rd of October 2009 (Fri), 05:36
matt damon
juanpafer
23rd of October 2009 (Fri), 08:14
Thanks for the laughing break. lol
John E
23rd of October 2009 (Fri), 08:50
Hyperfocal distance.
e02937
23rd of October 2009 (Fri), 08:52
lol.
SidinUSA
23rd of October 2009 (Fri), 10:31
Have to agree> It is indeed 42.