View Full Version : Discontinued: Canon 70-200 2.8 IS - apparently (NOT) confirmed
SMP_Homer
20th of July 2009 (Mon), 13:43
http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/07/70-200-f2-8l-is-discontinuation-confirmed/
Something newer/better coming?
oaktree
20th of July 2009 (Mon), 13:45
:confused::confused::confused::confused::confused:
gjl711
20th of July 2009 (Mon), 13:50
Hmm.. interesting. Maybe a 70-400IS F/2.8 is on the way. :)
cccc
20th of July 2009 (Mon), 13:50
Does this mean the price will drop?
I always thought this was the latest version of the 70-200... maybe a mk II?
Megapixle
20th of July 2009 (Mon), 14:00
A bunch of baloney, nothing has been confirmed. Their source is some bloke off an internet forum.
msowsun
20th of July 2009 (Mon), 14:00
http://www.canonrumors.com/
Actually, I have a BIG apology; I completely mis-read an email from our purchasing department. We have NO official notification that this is discontinued - we just can't get any at the moment.
I do apologize for any misunderstanding or concern that this has caused.
__________________
Helen Oster
Adorama Camera Customer Service Ambassador
helen.oster@adoramacamera.com
www.adorama.com
Jon
20th of July 2009 (Mon), 14:04
And from the CanonRumors source . . . http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1029&message=32450666
gjl711
20th of July 2009 (Mon), 14:15
So does that mean no 100-400 f/4? :(
pixelharmony
20th of July 2009 (Mon), 14:34
Nikon is rumored to discontinue their 70-200mm VR as well. Bigger and better things to replace a legendary lens is my guess. I don't know about the Canon FF users, but the 70-200mm supposedly showed some vingetting on a FF, maybe they got rid of that and placed a faster AF motor and better VR?
Jacobredphoto
20th of July 2009 (Mon), 14:46
Does this mean the price will drop? That would be fantastic, haha.
stathunter
20th of July 2009 (Mon), 14:49
And from the CanonRumors source . . . http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1029&message=32450666
Now confirmed to be not confirmed.
mbellot
20th of July 2009 (Mon), 15:03
Hmm.. interesting. Maybe a 70-400IS F/2.8 is on the way. :)
Sure.
And its going to be half the price of the 70-200/2.8 IS.
:lol:
Misiek
20th of July 2009 (Mon), 15:13
100-400 2.8 would be great as a replacement ;)
CyberDyneSystems
20th of July 2009 (Mon), 15:16
Apparently NOT
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=726174
Yes you read it here first so stop wasting time at that "other" Rumor source.
*Closed thread for being yet another Dupe of the same topic posted in THE WRONG FORUM
vBulletin® v3.6.12, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.