PDA

View Full Version : Canon's Camera Tech Information Dept Manager interviewed


FlyingPete
10th of May 2005 (Tue), 15:34
I keeping with the topic of the Nikon interview, here is one I found on Tomshardware from Canon:
http://www.tomshardware.com/hardnews/20050324_143333.html

Interesting, no 'pot shots' at Nikon!

An interesting quote:
"Consumers generally don't care about really high megapixel counts. It's the commercial studio that need to do double page spreads or 11 inch by 7 inch prints at 300dpi. We don't think there will be a huge jump in megapixels, rather it will be incremental, like f-stops. The Canon 1DS Mark II is at 16 megapixels, our next camera might have 22 megapixels.

On the compact point and shoot cams, each pixel is about 2 microns across, on the large frame cameras like the 1DS Mark II, the size is 6.4 microns. Theoretically, if you didn't care about noise, we could make a digital SLR that shoots 100 megapixels, but you would have to deal with huge file sizes."

Nice to know our lads are thinking smartly on pixel count and noise, and look out for a 22MP 1D series!

Longwatcher
10th of May 2005 (Tue), 16:32
Chuck Westfall is Canon's greatest assest versus Noink at least to English speaking/reading audience. He is a known personality, who people trust with the truth. Although he will occasionally side step an issue he has never been blatant about it from what I have seen. And he is usually actually aware of what is being said about Canon on line by the users.

Noink has no defense against him yet.

FlyingPete
10th of May 2005 (Tue), 16:37
Chuck Westfall is Canon's greatest assest versus Noink at least to English speaking/reading audience. He is a known personality, who people trust with the truth. Although he will occasionally side step an issue he has never been blatant about it from what I have seen. And he is usually actually aware of what is being said about Canon on line by the users.

Noink has no defense against him yet.

When did this "Noink" think start, only noticed it the last few days, used to be N*kon?

Longwatcher
11th of May 2005 (Wed), 12:28
When did this "Noink" think start, only noticed it the last few days, used to be N*kon?

I don't know if I a correctly blaming the correct person, but I remember that I first saw it a Belmondo post and it is much easier to type and seems more insulting then N*kon. Both are used to avoid search engines connecting up to this forum and confusing poor deluded Nikon users. :D

Andy_T
11th of May 2005 (Wed), 12:39
Both are used to avoid search engines connecting up to this forum and confusing poor deluded Nikon users. :D

That is a very good remark.

I will try in the future not to use combinations like Nikon, Nikkor, Nikonos, D70, D70s, D100, D90, F4, F4s, F601, F801 or others so that people searching for Nikon products will not be misguided here :wink:

Best regards,
Andy

Belmondo
11th of May 2005 (Wed), 13:17
When did this "Noink" think start, only noticed it the last few days, used to be N*kon?

I'm afraid I'm guilty. I didn't like all the asterisks when people typed N**** or N***n. I though it would be a kinder, gentler thing if we at least gave them all their letters, albeit in a slightlly different order.

FlyingPete
12th of May 2005 (Thu), 03:05
I'm afraid I'm guilty. I didn't like all the asterisks when people typed N**** or N***n. I though it would be a kinder, gentler thing if we at least gave them all their letters, albeit in a slightlly different order.

Quite clever really, I like it!