PDA

View Full Version : kimmy outdoor portraiture.


Cliff666
30th of July 2009 (Thu), 09:51
this set is from a portraiture i did for a friend about a month ago little less.

also anyone ever use the sigma 24-60 f2.8???? i honestly dont know what to think of this lens so far =/ anyone have any experience where this lens ussually gets sharp sharp at? f2.8 im having mixed feelings at wide open f5 seems ok but just wonder anyone elses experiences with this discontinued lens i feel like i may have been jipped by the camera store locally who sold me this in trade+ cash for my old trusty Tokina 12-24 which i sold because in my move over to a FF soon.

thanks in advance for any C&C!
1
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2562/3710791921_1a3381fe2b.jpg
2
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2529/3710791729_7cd5bba825.jpg
3
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3493/3711602144_471bc6da9e.jpg
4
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3528/3710791359_eceaef37d8.jpg
5
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3510/3710791593_f6c948b598.jpg
6
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2576/3767368067_04114751c3.jpg
7
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2080/3765188348_b69e11bc61.jpg

swjim
30th of July 2009 (Thu), 14:03
I like #6 best.

#s 1-2 her arms are pulled too far back.

#s 3-4 her expression looks like she wasn't ready for you to take the shot.

#s 5-7 the rimlight was a little heavy for my taste in that particular scene.

gonzogolf
30th of July 2009 (Thu), 16:09
I agree about the first two, the arms back pose doesnt work. I like the others although she tends to rely on a bemused sly smile, perhaps a full smile might be nice.

MattMoore
30th of July 2009 (Thu), 18:31
Agreed with above, #1 & #2 arms are way too far back

#5
-watch those hands, looks like she's missing both of them

#5 & #7
- turn the rimlight down a bit, and maybe a nice gel

aroundlsu
30th of July 2009 (Thu), 19:01
Overall they are good shots. Does this girl know you well? She is looking a little shy and reserved. Wish I could see her jumping through the scene or doing something with a bit more activity rather than just sitting there looking at you.

But it's better than most. I bet if you reshot this with the same girl she would be much more comfortable appearing the second time around.

aroundlsu
30th of July 2009 (Thu), 19:03
One more thing, I could do without the black and white post processing. They are adding absolutely nothing to the shots and in fact taking away a good bit. She is disappearing into the background in the b&w shots.

Of course, she probably thinks the b&w is really cool. :)

Grimlock
30th of July 2009 (Thu), 21:25
I knew I saw these photos before.

http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=722449

And it looks like you already made up your mind on the lens. lol.

http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=724488

Personally, I don't think the lens is bad at all. Looks sharp enough, IMO.

CliffordPhotography
31st of July 2009 (Fri), 00:06
Does she smile at all?

Cliff666
31st of July 2009 (Fri), 07:06
Does she smile at all?
in response of the smile.... =)
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3449/3711602328_04ac6bd90a.jpg