GovtLawyer
14th of May 2005 (Sat), 21:35
I shot some photos today with my XT in RAW + JPEG. I sampled the conversion process in the Canon software, Raw Shooter Essentials and the Adobe Camera Raw in Elements 3.0. I'm not sure which of the three I liked the best; they all were quite similar to me. In any event, I was pretty impressed with the process; in particular, the exposure process. I shot a black dog on a light background and the dog was underexposed. The exposure compensation was fantastic in this case. Of the three I have, are there any favorites out there, and why? Which functions in Adobe Camera Raw 3.1 are in CS2 and disabled in Elements 3.0.
I was under the impression that one of the programs would be able to compare the RAW and JPEG shot side-by-side. If so, which one, as I couldn't find it?
Now, for the oft asked question; to shoot both or not, when and why? If I only shoot RAW, am I correct in concluding that it makes no sense at all to use any in camera parameter settings; set everything to neutral. My understanding is those settings are ignored in RAW and only used in JPEG. If I shoot both RAW and JPEG, will some of the JPEGS come out so well exposed and processed that I need not use the RAW at all? Is shooting RAW and JPEG at the same time really an insurance situation?
I was under the impression that one of the programs would be able to compare the RAW and JPEG shot side-by-side. If so, which one, as I couldn't find it?
Now, for the oft asked question; to shoot both or not, when and why? If I only shoot RAW, am I correct in concluding that it makes no sense at all to use any in camera parameter settings; set everything to neutral. My understanding is those settings are ignored in RAW and only used in JPEG. If I shoot both RAW and JPEG, will some of the JPEGS come out so well exposed and processed that I need not use the RAW at all? Is shooting RAW and JPEG at the same time really an insurance situation?