View Full Version : Going to National Air Force Museum in Dayton, OH
k4show
12th of August 2009 (Wed), 12:03
Got any tips or advice? Tripod is allowed, but I think I will just use a monopod so it is lighter and smaller to lug around all day. I am staying overnight and will have two days so I can go thru the entire museum. I have at my disposal
40D
Tamron 17-50 F2.8
Canon 55-250
Canon 50 f1.8
Tamron 90mm macro
430EX and wireless triggers
Gary Fong
Thanks!
JackLiu
12th of August 2009 (Wed), 12:08
Consider renting/buying a 10-22 wide angle lens. Possibly won't use the 90mm macro and 430EX and wireless triggers. Just my 2-cents.
FlyingPhotog
12th of August 2009 (Wed), 13:09
If they allow tripods, use a tripod (and a cable release)
Unless they've spent a ton of money raising light levels and balancing it out better, parts of the joint are seriously cave like.
The 10-22 isn't a bad idea but it's a slower lens than your 17-50 and it can also cause noticeably more distortion when shot at 10mm.
P51Mstg
12th of August 2009 (Wed), 13:26
Jay is right it is a CAVE... 2 of three hangars are black inside. The third is painted white...... Forget the wireless triggers and 90mm
Tripods are OK, no problem..... I use it over the monopod
The Fong works good. You could use a wider lens there.
If you are there on the proper Fridays you can get into the restoration area (call them in advance/ see the website).
When you get there, head to the desk that is past the book shop outside the art gallery near the tail of the B-29 Bocks Car and get on the list to go across the field to the Presidental planes and X-Planes (IE B-70). They haul you over in a bus and give you like 40 minutes to do the 2 hangars and then take you back. Well worth it.
Been there a LOT of times over the last 34 years (live 3 hours away), so more questions ask here or PM me........
Mark H
k4show
12th of August 2009 (Wed), 13:34
Okay, renting is out of the question since I am going tommorow. I tried to get into the restoration areas but it was full(emailed ahead). I thought you could just go to the presidential hangers and x-planes? No need for a special list or bus ride? I am not sure though.
ChunkyDA
12th of August 2009 (Wed), 13:56
I think I'd recommend the trigger and remote flash. The lighting really does suck and the planes are so wedged in (especially in the presidential & experimental hanger) that it's hard to isolate the incredible specimines there. I think it's here on POTN where someone got a great shot of the B-2 with gelled flash. I'd love to bring all my equipment there but I usually am in town for work and need to travel light. I took these with a crappy Nikon P&S and was very disappointed. The staff is very helpful and you might get lucky enough to see a promotion or retirement ceremony.
Enjoy yourself and be sure to post what you get.
ChunkyDA
12th of August 2009 (Wed), 13:58
If you can get on the base, you can get there. You'll need a sponsor or the tourbus. The rest is free to the public.
P51Mstg
12th of August 2009 (Wed), 14:14
Again to get to the Presidental and XPlanes, you need to make a reservation when you get there in the morning (desk near B-29 tail). They will bus you across the field. They do fill up fairly quick so by 11am or so most seats are gone in the summer..
Mark H
k4show
12th of August 2009 (Wed), 17:05
Okay I will do that then. Is flash allowed there? I would probably use my Gary Fong, just so I don't have to deal with second long exposures. Also what ISO do you think would be best to stay around on the 40D, I was thinking 800 maybe? I will bring a tripod and cable release.
FlyingPhotog
12th of August 2009 (Wed), 17:33
Okay I will do that then. Is flash allowed there? I would probably use my Gary Fong, just so I don't have to deal with second long exposures. Also what ISO do you think would be best to stay around on the 40D, I was thinking 800 maybe? I will bring a tripod and cable release.
If you're on a tripod with a cable release (and using mirror lock up even) then the flash and high ISO are not necessary. Why introduce additonal noise if you don't have to?
The only reason you might want the flash is to open up really dark areas with a little fill.
I'd just hold it in my hand (not mounted on the camera) and pop it once or twice on low power during a longer exposure. Minor light painting as it were.
Just watch your viewfinder and try to avoid hot spots from direct light sources in the frame (when able) and shoot in manual mode so your meter isn't fooled by the wide contrast ratio in some places (eg, polished aluminum plane with a dark, dark, background...)
k4show
12th of August 2009 (Wed), 17:46
Okay thanks so much. Do you think lugging around a tripod is worth it? And is flash allowed by them for shots? Also is my telephoto worth bringing? (maybe there will be some planes flying on the base...) ?
FlyingPhotog
12th of August 2009 (Wed), 17:55
Okay thanks so much. Do you think lugging around a tripod is worth it? And is flash allowed by them for shots? Also is my telephoto worth bringing? (maybe there will be some planes flying on the base...) ?
The musuem is a ways away from the active part of Wright-Patterson AFB but the views accross the field from the museum to the research areas are kind of interesting so the telephoto might be handy. You can also isolate details on aircraft in the museum with it as well as those hanging above.
Can't see why flash would be a problem. I'm sure you'll see 1001 folks with P&S cameras flashing away (who'll then get home and wonder why they got one bright spot surrounded by a sea of black...)
One other suggestion: Bracket your exposures. Two reason...
1) Getting the right exposure in some parts of the museum is tricky so don't be afraid to burn some 1s and 0s to get a solid keeper.
2) You just might get a set of images that you can combine via HDR or Exposure Blending in post when you get home. Just don't bump the tripod between shots so your frames stay registered.
Heck, a nice collection of just the Nose Art alone would be worth the visit even if I couldn't get the entire B36 in one shot! ;) Have Fun!!!
ChunkyDA
12th of August 2009 (Wed), 18:56
Another nice thing about the tripod is you could shoot a real long exposure to remove the rest of the visitors that are moving around.
Now I'm gonna need to head to the Air Armament Museum (http://www.afarmamentmuseum.com/)to try some of these ideas.
FlyingPhotog
12th of August 2009 (Wed), 18:57
Another nice thing about the tripod is you could shoot a real long exposure to remove the rest of the visitors that are moving around.
Now I'm gonna need to head to the Air Armament Museum (http://www.afarmamentmuseum.com/)to try some of these ideas.
Brilliant thinking sir...
k4show
12th of August 2009 (Wed), 19:00
Wow great idea, I will do that for sure!
k4show
12th of August 2009 (Wed), 22:40
The musuem is a ways away from the active part of Wright-Patterson AFB but the views accross the field from the museum to the research areas are kind of interesting so the telephoto might be handy.
If I also went to the actual AFB are you allowed to take pictures of the planes taking off and landing?
FlyingPhotog
13th of August 2009 (Thu), 02:54
If I also went to the actual AFB are you allowed to take pictures of the planes taking off and landing?
If they're landing at WPAFB toward the Northeast, you can actually see planes going left to right facing out from the Museum in the parking lot.
They're still fairly high though at that point.
This might be the park I'm remembering from when I lived in that area back in the mid 1980's. IIRC, there's enough of a hill to see at least part of the active runway.
http://www.aviationdayton.com/places/wright-memorial.html
It's been many years so your mileage may vary...
DC Fan
13th of August 2009 (Thu), 05:54
Handheld, no flash, high ISO. Use the museum's impressive lighting. An image stabilizer lens helps with the long exposures in low light, or take several exposures in sequence and choose the best one.
These images were from a Digital Rebel 300d and a EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 lens.
http://www.kevinlillard.com/racing/nmusaf071706a0037.jpg
Flash Used: No
Focal Length: 38.0mm
Exposure Time: 0.067 s (1/15)
Aperture: f/5.0
ISO equiv: 800
White Balance: Auto
Metering Mode: Matrix
http://www.kevinlillard.com/racing/nmusaf071706a0056.jpg
Flash Used: No
Focal Length: 18.0mm
Exposure Time: 0.077 s (1/13)
Aperture: f/3.5
ISO equiv: 800
White Balance: Auto
Metering Mode: Matrix
http://www.kevinlillard.com/racing/nmusaf071706a0046.jpg
Flash Used: No
Focal Length: 31.0mm
Exposure Time: 0.125 s (1/8)
Aperture: f/4.5
ISO equiv: 800
White Balance: Auto
Metering Mode: Matrix
mlav
14th of August 2009 (Fri), 01:48
DO NOT use a monopod.
I was going after low noise ISO100 shots. Tripod, two bodies, five lenses...580, 580II, 430...
An F-4 was a pain, I shot with two remote flashes to add fill on a rear end shot.
Shoot RAW.
It is very dark, my exposures were typically 8-15s. Make sure you have a remote shutter release.
Lots of ropes around the planes. Cloning/healing skills will help a lot with the final product.
The B-36 is a big disappointment. The protruding wing from right in the shot above is a great example.
DC Fan
14th of August 2009 (Fri), 13:12
An F-4 was a pain, I shot with two remote flashes to add fill on a rear end shot.
F-4C Phantom II at the Museum of the U.S. Air Force.
http://www.fansview.com/racing/nmusaf071706a0165.jpg
Camera Model: Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL
Flash Used: No
Focal Length: 28.0mm
Exposure Time: 0.050 s (1/20)
Aperture: f/4.0
ISO equiv: 800
White Balance: Auto
Metering Mode: Matrix
This facility is a place where the standard strategy of using flash doesn't work well, unless you have several studio strobes and really big light modifiers. Even the smallest plane in the display is too large to be illuminated by shoe-mount flashes. The sort of lighting you get from a motion film crew handling a major location shoot -- really big and powerful lights -- would be more useful.
So, since you're unlikely to be able to carry the light you'd need to the location, you need to use the light that's already on hand. The museum's Cold War Gallery, where the Convair B-36J Peacemaker is located, already has effective and dramatic lighting in place. The trick is to use that light to its best advantage, and to adjust to that light rather than to try to control the situation.
That lack of control extends to the positioning of the aircraft. Yes, they're close together, but that the best you can expect at the museum, or at most aviation museums. (Legend has it that the building that houses the B-36J was constructed around the airplane.)
And, if you want to see a B-36 more or less by itself, you need to travel to Arizona where one is kept out in the open. (http://www.pimaair.org/collection-detail.php?cid=58)
mlav
14th of August 2009 (Fri), 15:36
The F-4 I am referring to is backed up to a wall. Not much light is required to bring out the shadow details on the tail. Two Canon Speedlites easily handle the job - again, fill, not primary lighting...
k4show
14th of August 2009 (Fri), 22:09
I just got back and it was amazing, got some great shots. EXTREMELY glad I brought a tripod, and I dont really care about the ropes around it, its a museum what do you expect? I will post my shots later
Naturalist
14th of August 2009 (Fri), 22:12
Getting onto WPAFB is not hard. Its the clearance you need to go 13 stories below ground level to the alien autopsy rooms that's a bitch! :cool:
JWright
15th of August 2009 (Sat), 19:59
Got any tips or advice? Tripod is allowed, but I think I will just use a monopod so it is lighter and smaller to lug around all day. I am staying overnight and will have two days so I can go thru the entire museum. I have at my disposal
40D
Tamron 17-50 F2.8
Canon 55-250
Canon 50 f1.8
Tamron 90mm macro
430EX and wireless triggers
Gary Fong
Thanks!
I would suggest leaving Gary Fong at home. I don't really think he'd be much help to you...:rolleyes: ;)
If I also went to the actual AFB are you allowed to take pictures of the planes taking off and landing?
Assuming you could get on the base, the military is pretty anal about photography on their bases. I'm Retired Navy and can get on most of the bases in the San Diego area, but I'm not going to walk out to the flight line at Miramar or North Island and start taking pictures without a good reason and certainly not without permission.
The best way to get pictures of flying military aircraft is to attend an airshow at one of the bases.
k4show
20th of August 2009 (Thu), 21:47
Tripod was very worth it along with a remote shutter release and mirror lock. Most exposures were around a second or so in every hangar but the presidental/xplanes, and the modern flight gallery, at ISO 200 and F2.8-8 or so.
Here are the shots.
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=741008
asysin2leads
22nd of August 2009 (Sat), 03:06
If you want to catch planes coming into Rwy 23R, take a look at this in Google Earth (39 50'00.33 N, 84 01'28.79"W). It's a public park and I've sat there for a while a few times. I've only been stopped by one cop and it wasn't an issue. He was more curious than anything. If you get a chance, quite often there are F-16s that fly out of Springfield-Beckley Airport. It's only about 30 min away from WPAFB.
vBulletin® v3.6.12, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.