PDA

View Full Version : The Milky Way over Lake Tahoe


CaptainTonus
18th of August 2009 (Tue), 13:10
Canon Rebel XT, Tokina 11-16 @ f/2.8, ISO 800, 30' exposure, MF to Infinity, no noise reduction.

http://home.tiora.net/tony/Tahoe/IMG_8522small.jpg

canonnoob
18th of August 2009 (Tue), 13:11
great shot! i think it is pretty cool

Karl Johnston
18th of August 2009 (Tue), 14:30
Love it, really good shot

boclcown
18th of August 2009 (Tue), 14:37
fantastic

elysium
18th of August 2009 (Tue), 14:39
Stunning. That is my photo of the day. :)

Really love the framing, the colours, the entire thing is great. Thanks for sharing.

Gorveatt
18th of August 2009 (Tue), 14:52
Wow. the only thing i can think of that would make it better is if the trees weren't there, but that's just me, you may have intended them to be there

Desertraptor
18th of August 2009 (Tue), 14:53
Nice shot

cspratt
18th of August 2009 (Tue), 14:58
Great shot love the tree framing.

CaptainTonus
18th of August 2009 (Tue), 15:25
Thanks for the compliments guys. :)

As far as the trees, it was sort of hard to avoid having them in the frame. I could have done without them, but I do think it frames the shot somewhat as well. The lights showing up on them were from cars going past, might have been better if they weren't half-lit.

windpig
18th of August 2009 (Tue), 15:42
Most excellent!

Vulcan58
18th of August 2009 (Tue), 15:54
Blimey! It's all there.
Superb detail - thank you.

aram535
18th of August 2009 (Tue), 16:19
I'm amazed, I would have figured 30' of exposure would have given you a bit of a star trail, no?

CaptainTonus
18th of August 2009 (Tue), 16:31
I'm amazed, I would have figured 30' of exposure would have given you a bit of a star trail, no?

At an 11mm focal length it takes a lot longer of an exposure to get trails, usually around one minute.

Adam Jones
18th of August 2009 (Tue), 17:57
Cool photo! Potential noob question here:

Would a reverse ND filter have had a positive effect on the shot? (For the light pollution from the horizon down).

CaptainTonus
18th of August 2009 (Tue), 18:10
Cool photo! Potential noob question here:

Would a reverse ND filter have had a positive effect on the shot? (For the light pollution from the horizon down).

I've never thought about that. In general, I avoid using any and all filters at night, because they can cause nasty flares and reflections.

ejicon
18th of August 2009 (Tue), 18:17
Holy goodness. Excellent. Was this with a telescope or just mounted on a tripod and shot? Excellent indeed.

unnerv
18th of August 2009 (Tue), 18:50
spectacular

CaptainTonus
18th of August 2009 (Tue), 19:39
Holy goodness. Excellent. Was this with a telescope or just mounted on a tripod and shot? Excellent indeed.

No telescope. I was using an Ultra-Wide Angle lens. I had everything mounted to a $20 tripod I bought from Wal-Mart. :)

markjpcs
18th of August 2009 (Tue), 20:12
Cool shot!

Celestron
18th of August 2009 (Tue), 22:48
Looking good Captain !

Naturalist
18th of August 2009 (Tue), 22:51
I think it is a great image but would be better if the line of lights on the far shore were level. Very nice.

ckckevin
19th of August 2009 (Wed), 02:17
So this is 30" rather 30', haha... i was thinking it must have some sort of tails too...

CaptainTonus
19th of August 2009 (Wed), 09:39
So this is 30" rather 30', haha... i was thinking it must have some sort of tails too...

Sorry for the confusion there. It was a 30-second exposure, not 30 minutes.

Jon Foster
21st of August 2009 (Fri), 00:50
Wow. That is a fantastic shot! There is no way we could shots like that around here. I'm jealous!

Jon.