Model Photoshoot in the field your thoughts please.

[aznsoccerstar11]

a
http://i32.tinypic.com/10fndjt.jpg
b
http://i32.tinypic.com/14vmrr7.jpg

Also which edit.
1

http://i27.tinypic.com/28mptma.jpg

2
http://i27.tinypic.com/eg652r.jpg

3
http://i28.tinypic.com/52ncq8.jpg

[MDJAK]

I'm no expert, but I think those are very nicely done.

[Deeners]

I'm also not an expert, I think your shots look great!!! The first one, the house and what ever else is in the background, to me is a bit distracting.

[jwoods85]

i agree with deeners. The first would be perfect without buildings behind her. Very pretty girl!

[aznsoccerstar11]

thanks!

[Grimlock]

These are great!
Good location, exposure, colors, and lighting.

As for the edits. I prefer the 3rd. In the other two edits the sky is blown. The sky definitely adds to the photo in the 3rd edit. Just my opinion.

Very nice work.

[hawkeye60]

The #3 edit for me.

[Heidi Anderson]

# 2. Is the best, the color is perfect. I like the background, but would of flatted the grass down in the foreground just a bit.

[firefighter4u]

Love 1 (even with the buildings) and 2.

[Rkoa63]

I like 1 & 2 the best. I actually think that the buildings in the background add to the shot.

My only critique is that her shirt blends in with the grass too much in the last two pics.

[johnaengus]

a and 3 for me!

[TsPoet]

The location/size/boldness of "Troy Huynh" makes them all look like advertisements for a beer named Troy Huynh and ruins them for me.
Nice shots, though.

[aznsoccerstar11]

thanks everyone!

lol ive never seen a beer add like this show me!

[AlphaChicken]

I like the tone of the third version of the last image, with the B&W processing shown in the first version.

Very nice job on these. No expert here either in this area, but I did very much enjoy looking. Good thing. :)

[TsPoet]

thanks everyone!

lol ive never seen a beer add like this show me!

maybe it's a gender thing, as a woman, a pretty woman isn't really enough to grab and hold my eye. She's pretty, they are nice shots, but...
The signature is leading right into the rule of threes - and it's in the spot that you want eye's led, so that's what I see.
There are tons of advertisements out there that use the same thing - a nice but not too obtrusive background, the subject (alcohol bottle, dish washing detergent, whatever) in the left quadrant, then the name of the product in bold on the line between the upper and lower right quadrant.
No one else seems to be bothered, so maybe I'm nuts, but your name is all I see.

[ShelleyK]

Nobody else say what was wrong in shot B??
Look at her chest? The dress...her boobs are falling too low, you can see the lower part of her breasts in the part of the dress that should be located under them.

[lexart]

i like # 1 and # 2
for #1, it would have been better if you placed that roof behind her so its not visible
Maybe an off camera flash with big soft box placed in an angle would give a more dramatic look. Great shots.

[jetcode]

In terms of light #2 is the best but I think if you had shot this from a lower or higher perspective (knees or step ladder) it might have more interest. It looks like you are using a normal lens thus a normal eye level perspective. The extra sky at the top isn't adding much either.

The last 3 have no real visual contrast to them ...