what lens does this guy uses ?

[anorphirith]

http://www.flickr.com/photos/fbuk/ (Mod Warning - glamour and implied nude images in link)

the bokeh behind his portraits is stunning
I think it's the 85mm 1.2, am I right ?

[crashthenet44]

Why don't you just message the guy and ask him? I don't see EXIF in these pics, so for all we know he's using an XS with a nifty fifty.

[Lojt]

Thats a damn nice bokeh, and some nice round bokeh highlights. My guess is Canon 200mm F/2.0

[bubba zanetti]

I have the 135 f2 & it can do this. Could be one of several....i'd ask.

[wables]

I'm kinda curious myself, if you ask, post it here porfavor

[anorphirith]

yeah exif do not show anything, and he does not answer my questions ! I guess he likes to keep it for himself.
some say 135mm some say 85L

[FIXXER04]

They tend to look zoomed. Most shots like that are usually with a 70-200 f2.8

[CBokeh]

On some of the last shots in the gallery I see the pentagon (5 blade) bokeh of the 50mm f/1.8...

[Jon Foster]

I say ask the guy. You might want to ask him about his lighting while you are at it. Some of it looks great.

Jon.

[amonline]

85 1.2. He belongs to the group also. The images reminded me of mine, so I went to his "public groups". ;)

[taccca]

man some of those photos are amazing, and the girls are stunning

[Psychobiker]

Could also get that look at 200mm on a 2.8L, zoom compression is evident in some of them, not all.

[charlieharper]

I sent him a message to no avail........

Loving his colours and processing though, what are the reverse engineering thoughts ?

Austen.

[SupraWez]

As you flick through the gallery to page 9 you can see he has marked some as 580EXII camera right & 580EXII on camera for lighting and another 85mm 1.2 for lens.

Great gallery indeed :)

[amonline]

People just don't read. :(

[charlieharper]

..... to page 9 you can see he has marked some as 580EXII camera right & 580EXII on camera for lighting and another 85mm 1.2 for lens.....People just don't read. :(

Thanks SupraWez, I (and obviously many others) hadn't made it to page 9 to notice that !! Appreciate the heads-up !

amonline, I (and obviously many others) did check out quite a few of the pages in question, but somewhat less then 9. Maybe after not finding the information we were after in 8 pages we gave up ?

Also, as has been stated, several people did message the guy seeking more information but to no avail ......

But I digress, Great work, and thanks to both the OP of this thread for bringing it to our attention, and "thphotos" for the Flickr gallery.

CH.

[Naturalist]

People just don't read.

I know - but bear with them as they usually come through.