*Zwitter*
20th of May 2005 (Fri), 14:02
I've been reading a few things on here about this lens being soft etc...
I must admit, it doesn't look as sharp as a lot of other peoples photos with other lenses, but I've had it for years and guess I'm used to it (used to have it on a 35mm EOS - now using a 20D)
Would I get a big increase in sharpness if I got a 70-300 instead?
If it really is as crap as people say, what would be a good replacement, if not the above, and before you say 'L", not too expensive please!
thanks in advance
I must admit, it doesn't look as sharp as a lot of other peoples photos with other lenses, but I've had it for years and guess I'm used to it (used to have it on a 35mm EOS - now using a 20D)
Would I get a big increase in sharpness if I got a 70-300 instead?
If it really is as crap as people say, what would be a good replacement, if not the above, and before you say 'L", not too expensive please!
thanks in advance