View Full Version : Glass for Packers game this weekend: 100-400L or 28-300L?
highv0lt6ge
14th of September 2009 (Mon), 15:57
So I'm going to the Packers-Bengals tilt this weekend, and decided I wanted to rent some glass for the trip. I was looking at my options and reading through others experiences, and have narrowed it down to the 28-300L and the 100-400L.
The Packers website says no glass over 12 inches, and these fit under the requirement.
My question - for those with experience - what would be the better fit? Would my sigma 70-200 be okay for the need? I was also thinking of renting a wide angle.
Thanks for all of the help!
DDCSD
14th of September 2009 (Mon), 21:49
Where are your seats?
I'd take the 100-400 and your 18-55 for some wide shots. I was in the second row at the Eagles-Vikings Wildcard game last year with my 70-200 and it was pretty short for most things on the field.
dipps
14th of September 2009 (Mon), 22:00
my vote would be for the 100-400L.
asysin2leads
15th of September 2009 (Tue), 00:33
Where are your seats?
I'd take the 100-400 and your 18-55 for some wide shots. I was in the second row at the Eagles-Vikings Wildcard game last year with my 70-200 and it was pretty short for most things on the field.
Dereck,
Thanks for the link to Scott. RIP
highv0lt6ge
15th of September 2009 (Tue), 16:29
They are in the endzone, in row 40. I think the 100-400 will be much needed. Would it be worth getting a wide angle too? Figured that might give some unique shots.
polarbare
15th of September 2009 (Tue), 17:16
40 rows back? longest lens you can take.
DDCSD
15th of September 2009 (Tue), 18:40
They are in the endzone, in row 40. I think the 100-400 will be much needed. Would it be worth getting a wide angle too? Figured that might give some unique shots.
Def the 100-400.
An UWA or fisheye would make for a few cool shots.
vBulletin® v3.6.12, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.