cmdisme
15th of September 2009 (Tue), 17:54
I've been looking at the G10 (now watching for G11 samples to show up). I want something cleaner than my old FZ28 (which the G10 is -- better sharpness, less color blotchiness, cleaner skin tones, though actual high ISO noise is close).
I came across a comparison with the G10 and SX110 (pocket superzoom). I downloaded the sample shots. Surprisingly they looked close -- very close -- even viewed on large display side by side. I downloaded the same scene with a SX200 (newer pocket superzoom) and the results were again pretty close (though it seemed to have a touch of corner softness).
All 3 cameras have manual control, longer ranges, larger LCDs, fairly bright lenses (SX110 being the quickest), etc. The G10 shoots RAW and has a hot shoe (both features I doubt I'd use). The G10 also costs far more and can be used as a defense weapon.
So just talking straight IQ how does the G10 compare to the lessor Canons -- AUTO to AUTO?
I came across a comparison with the G10 and SX110 (pocket superzoom). I downloaded the sample shots. Surprisingly they looked close -- very close -- even viewed on large display side by side. I downloaded the same scene with a SX200 (newer pocket superzoom) and the results were again pretty close (though it seemed to have a touch of corner softness).
All 3 cameras have manual control, longer ranges, larger LCDs, fairly bright lenses (SX110 being the quickest), etc. The G10 shoots RAW and has a hot shoe (both features I doubt I'd use). The G10 also costs far more and can be used as a defense weapon.
So just talking straight IQ how does the G10 compare to the lessor Canons -- AUTO to AUTO?