View Full Version : In the garden
anthonyi
30th of September 2009 (Wed), 15:45
My kids in the garden...this is a photograph dating form shortly after I acquired my first SLR so I know it's pretty flawed. I had a play with it anyway to get to a different look and this is the result. C&C always welcome.
Shot with a 400D and 50 f1.4
anthonyi
1st of October 2009 (Thu), 03:27
Thanks - the colours were what I played with (along with some selective blur and a little vignette) so they're all my fault! The original was pretty much as you'd expect in terms of colouring.
darosk
1st of October 2009 (Thu), 03:34
I like the color work. Great shot :)
queenbee288
2nd of October 2009 (Fri), 06:33
I also like the color work.
jenirose3
2nd of October 2009 (Fri), 09:06
Can you post the SOOC so we can play with it? I think it's overexposed but the SOOC may not be. Also I think the blurring may be at work here.
anthonyi
2nd of October 2009 (Fri), 11:57
Yes, it was overexposed (hence my comments about the original being flawed). At the time I hadn't understood RAW either, so it was shot as a JPEG which further limited any opportunity to recover blown highlights.
I'm not sure what you mean by "the blurring may be at work here" - some blur was intentionally added.
Anyway here's the original SOOC bar the crop, resize and save for web - although I can't for the life of me think why anyone would want to play with! :-)
anthonyi
2nd of October 2009 (Fri), 11:58
I like the color work. Great shot :)
I also like the color work.
Thanks!
ears
2nd of October 2009 (Fri), 12:09
I like the selective blur! It brings the attention to te kids faces. Some people do not like selective blurring saying that it takes away from the photo but if it is done right I think it works. Yours works! Nice job ;)
anthonyi
2nd of October 2009 (Fri), 12:17
I like the selective blur! It brings the attention to te kids faces. Some people do not like selective blurring saying that it takes away from the photo but if it is done right I think it works. Yours works! Nice job ;)
Thanks...I was really just trying to do something a little different with an image I liked, even though the original capture was less than perfect. I know it won't be everyone's cup of tea and that's understandable. Always fun to try new things though.
jenirose3
2nd of October 2009 (Fri), 16:04
I will have a go when i get home. I think the SOOC has great potential.
anthonyi
2nd of October 2009 (Fri), 16:36
Great, thanks. I'm looking forward to seeing a different take on it.
jenirose3
2nd of October 2009 (Fri), 18:54
I thought maybe the back of her shirt was blown but I took it in to LR and 99% of it was recoverable. It was a small file so editing was a bit limited. When I said blurring at work it was a gentle way of saying it looks like a blurry OOF picture. The SOOC obviously was not. It actually had great natural "blur".
anthonyi
3rd of October 2009 (Sat), 03:55
Yes it was shot at f2.5. The edit in the OP above was an attempt to do something different, with a bit of an aged feel - so there was some additional blur as well as the colour changes.
Thanks for your edit...I'll look more closely at the highlights - I thought they were blown in that area too...
jenirose3
3rd of October 2009 (Sat), 08:34
Obivously editing is a very personal thing. The photographer has a "vision" and that "vision" may not be the same as other photographers. That being said my comments are said from the 'IMHO' point of view.
anthonyi
3rd of October 2009 (Sat), 09:10
For sure, and it would be a very dull world if we all looked at it the same way...thanks very much for your input, I do appreciate it.
CliffordPhotography
5th of October 2009 (Mon), 10:25
I really like what you've come up with, it sets the mood for the shot.
vBulletin® v3.6.12, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.