busyone
29th of May 2005 (Sun), 15:25
I am now on the fence. After reading all the Tamron 28-75/f2.8 reviews, I was set on purchasing it as my starter lens for my 20D. I went to B&H today to check it out, and I started having doubts...wonder if it's wide enough because of the 1.6x factor.
Original plan was to start with the Tamron (good price, great speed). Maybe a year later, I was going to contemplate the Canon 16-35/f2.8 and one day add the 70-200/f2.8.
After researching here, I had made up my mind never to go slower than f2.8, even if that means being very slow and patient with lens purchases over time.
HOWEVER, now that I wonder if I should start wider, my current budget will only allow the cost of the EF 17-40/4L. (My absolute max.) Should I go here, or was my original instinct to not go slower than f2.8 correct?
Appreciate some advice from you knowledgable folks...
Original plan was to start with the Tamron (good price, great speed). Maybe a year later, I was going to contemplate the Canon 16-35/f2.8 and one day add the 70-200/f2.8.
After researching here, I had made up my mind never to go slower than f2.8, even if that means being very slow and patient with lens purchases over time.
HOWEVER, now that I wonder if I should start wider, my current budget will only allow the cost of the EF 17-40/4L. (My absolute max.) Should I go here, or was my original instinct to not go slower than f2.8 correct?
Appreciate some advice from you knowledgable folks...