View Full Version : Perfect prop blur (Ikarus C42B)
Semmonka
25th of October 2009 (Sun), 10:07
Well I was hoping to get perfect prop blur until the pilot turned engine off.
He was just demonstrating how easily it can be still controlled if engine fails.
http://www.vk-photography.net/images/1DMN2845.jpg
PhotosGuy
25th of October 2009 (Sun), 10:24
Good shot. ...until the pilot turned engine off. Good excuse! I don't think anyone else has used that one yet. :D
Semmonka
25th of October 2009 (Sun), 11:02
Good excuse!
Wooot? Dude, I aint kidding so no excuse here
Cyclop
25th of October 2009 (Sun), 13:02
Nice shot.
RadAL
25th of October 2009 (Sun), 19:42
the engine does look off... even if the shutter speed is very high... you can see faint traces of blur ;)
Semmonka
26th of October 2009 (Mon), 03:04
Engine looks off as it is off.
1/250 does not freeze prop that much. Its ultra light plane so it pretty much stays in the air like a feather. Wings has aluminium frame and just some fabric.
Its easy to see light coming trough the wings. Light plane with 100HP engine is not the easiest to flight on windy weather I think :D
FlyingPhotog
26th of October 2009 (Mon), 03:16
Any good reason as to why the pilot decided to do a dead stick demo?
Semmonka
26th of October 2009 (Mon), 04:25
Any good reason as to why the pilot decided to do a dead stick demo?
No idea. It happened during airshow and they just said it can land without any problem even if the engine is not running. I dont know anything about planes so there might be tons of planes that can do the same
FlyingPhotog
26th of October 2009 (Mon), 05:32
No idea. It happened during airshow and they just said it can land without any problem even if the engine is not running. I dont know anything about planes so there might be tons of planes that can do the same
Actually, they all can. Some just glide better than others.
gkarris
26th of October 2009 (Mon), 11:05
Shouldn't the prop have been windmilling?
FlyingPhotog
26th of October 2009 (Mon), 14:15
Shouldn't the prop have been windmilling?
Not necessarily. If you shut off the engine and slow the airspeed enough, you can have a case where there's not enough inertia to overcome a compression cycle and you can stop rotation entirely.
Also, it's probably a very lightweight composite prop so it won't have as much rotational mass and can reach the above state sooner.
Semmonka
26th of October 2009 (Mon), 15:20
Any idea of compression ratio of small engine like that?
I know it takes lot of power to rotate cars crank so its pretty hard to imagine that air will rotate crank at speeds that kind of plane can do
gkarris
26th of October 2009 (Mon), 15:25
Not necessarily. If you shut off the engine and slow the airspeed enough, you can have a case where there's not enough inertia to overcome a compression cycle and you can stop rotation entirely.
Also, it's probably a very lightweight composite prop so it won't have as much rotational mass and can reach the above state sooner.
Oh - okay. Used to a C172... ;)
FlyingPhotog
26th of October 2009 (Mon), 15:28
Oh - okay. Used to a C172... ;)
It can happen in a C172 as well (or so I'm told...) :shock:
vBulletin® v3.6.12, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.