Disfear @ Lutakko

[kmb]

... a few months back. They're from Sweden, not-mainstream metal.

1.
http://www.bjorklid.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/09-09-10-232159-9905.jpg

2.
http://www.bjorklid.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/09-09-10-232535-9932.jpg

3.
http://www.bjorklid.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/09-09-10-232401-9921.jpg

4.
http://www.bjorklid.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/09-09-10-233750-0010.jpg

5.
http://www.bjorklid.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/09-09-10-234004-0019.jpg

6.
http://www.bjorklid.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/09-09-10-234446-0037.jpg

[René Damkot]

Solid set & good "feel".

Not too fond of #5 I think. A bit closer together might have been better.

Like #2, 4 and 6.

[DwightMcCann]

I expect it was bad lighting but even though B&W they are pretty dark and contrasty lacking detail.

[narlus]

I expect it was bad lighting but even though B&W they are pretty dark and contrasty lacking detail.

which is the style i like.


i always like seeing yr work, Kalle, since it's so different from most of the shots one sees (either here or otherwise). it's clear you are working in a very different aesthetic, and you take chances.

3, 4 and 6 are all very good. #2 is about the only one that doesn't work for me.

i think #5 is very interesting, as you managed to capture their eyes framed by mic cords/arms/obstructions brilliantly.

bonus points for wearing a Trap Them shirt. :D

[kmb]

Thanks for the comments.

Yeah, I've understood that the culture/style of photography on these forums is such that my current style might not quite fit in, but I hope the different approach is, well, interesting to some of you and I'm happy to see - based on the comments - that this seems to be the case.

[nashkell]

i love number one, just gritty and awesome